Resource-efficient nitrogen removal from source separated urine with partial nitritation/anammox in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor

Source separation and decentralized urine treatment can cut costs in centralized wastewater treatment by diverting 80% of the nitrogen load in sewage. One promising approach for nitrogen removal in this context is partial nitritation/anammox (PN/A), reducing the aeration demand by 67% and organics dosage by 100% compared to nitrification/denitrification. Whilst previous studies with suspended biomass have encountered stability issues during PN/A treatment of urine, a PN/A biofilm was hypothesized to be more resilient. Its use for urine treatment was pioneered here for maximum rates and efficiencies in the energy efficient membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR). Nitrogen removal rates of 1.0 g N L-1 d-1 and removal efficiencies of 80-95% were achieved during a 335-day stable operation at 28°C on stabilized (pH>11), diluted urine (10%). A balance between N2 and NO3 - formation was observed whilst optimizing the supply of O2 and was rate limiting for the conversion towards N2. Short-term operation on less- and undiluted urine yielded N removal rates of 0.6-0.8 g N L-1 d-1 and removal efficiencies of 93% on 66% urine and 85% on undiluted urine. Metataxonomic analysis and fluorescence in-situ hybridization confirmed the presence of biofilms consisting of nitrifiers (Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira) at the membrane side and anammox bacteria (“Candidatus Brocadia”) at the anoxic bulk side. The findings suggest that a biofilm approach to PN/A treatment of urine overcomes stability issues, and a PN/A-MABR has significant potential for resource efficient decentralized treatment. In human long-duration deep-space missions, this gravity-independent technology could produce N2 to compensate artificial atmosphere losses whilst facilitating water recovery from urine. [GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT, COLOR]

[1]  S. Vlaeminck,et al.  Oxygen control and stressor treatments for complete and long-term suppression of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in biofilm-based partial nitritation/anammox. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[2]  S. Vlaeminck,et al.  Electrochemical In Situ pH Control Enables Chemical-Free Full Urine Nitrification with Concomitant Nitrate Extraction. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Arifur Rahman,et al.  Performance of a lab-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactor treating nitrogen dominant space-based wastewater through simultaneous nitrification-denitrification , 2020 .

[4]  Francesc Gòdia,et al.  Bio-electrochemical COD removal for energy-efficient, maximum and robust nitrogen recovery from urine through membrane aerated nitrification. , 2020, Water research.

[5]  P. Gikas,et al.  Energy Consumption and Internal Distribution in Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plants of Greece , 2020, Water.

[6]  M. Mancini,et al.  Water Scarcity and Wastewater Reuse Standards in Southern Europe: Focus on Agriculture , 2017, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[7]  Erik Kärrman,et al.  Source separation: Challenges & opportunities for transition in the swedish wastewater sector , 2017 .

[8]  Tove A. Larsen,et al.  A novel approach for stabilizing fresh urine by calcium hydroxide addition , 2016, Water research.

[9]  M. E. Suárez-Ojeda,et al.  Denitritation in an anoxic granular reactor using phenol as sole organic carbon source , 2016 .

[10]  Michael J. Semmens,et al.  Performance analysis of a pilot-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of landfill leachate , 2015 .

[11]  C. Holliger,et al.  Linking bacterial population dynamics and nutrient removal in the granular sludge biofilm ecosystem engineered for wastewater treatment. , 2014, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[12]  B. Smets,et al.  Autotrophic Nitrogen Removal in a Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor Under Continuous Aeration: A Demonstration , 2013 .

[13]  A. Klindworth,et al.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Urine nitrification and sewer discharge to realize in-sewer denitrification to simplify sewage treatment in Hong Kong. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  R. Méndez,et al.  Monitoring the stability of an anammox reactor under high salinity conditions. , 2010 .

[16]  Hongjie Wang,et al.  Effect of DO on simultaneous removal of carbon and nitrogen by a membrane aeration/filtration combined bioreactor , 2009 .

[17]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Nitrogen removal from digested black water by one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[19]  M. Strous,et al.  Adaptation of a freshwater anammox population to high salinity wastewater. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[20]  Treatment , 1963 .

[21]  G. BERTRAM KERSHAW,et al.  The Activated Sludge Process , 1928, Nature.

[22]  R. Mines,et al.  Treatment Systems , 2018 .

[23]  B. Smets,et al.  Start-up strategies of membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) for completely autotrophic nitrogen removal , 2009 .

[24]  M. Jetten,et al.  CANON and Anammox in a gas-lift reactor. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.