Detection of (anti)symmetry and (anti)repetition: Perceptual mechanisms versus cognitive strategies

Symmetry and repetition are recognized as cues in perceptual organization, but there is disagreement on whether they are detected automatically. This disagreement is resolved by noting that some studies mixed up shape regularities and shape antiregularities (i.e., symmetries and repetitions with mismatches in contour curvature polarity). The results of two experiments indicate that a task-irrelevant regularity is automatically picked up by the visual system, whereas a task-irrelevant antiregularity is not. This suggests that detection of regularities is part of the visual system's intrinsic encoding, whereas detection of antiregularities requires higher cognitive strategies involving selective attention.

[1]  C. Gray.  The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration Still Alive and Well , 1999, Neuron.

[2]  Peter A. van der Helm,et al.  Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: from surprisals to precisals. , 2000 .

[3]  Vicky G Bruce,et al.  Violations of Symmetry and Repetition in Visual Patterns , 1975 .

[4]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Symmetry detection and visual attention: a “binary-map” hypothesis , 2002, Vision Research.

[5]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[6]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Effects of Pattern Orientation and Number of Symmetry Axes on the Detection of Mirror Symmetry in Dot and Solid Patterns , 1998, Perception.

[7]  G. Kanizsa.  Seeing and thinking. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[8]  E. Mach.  Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen , 1886 .

[9]  T. Poggio,et al.  Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[10]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  From Geons to Structure. A Note on Object Representation , 1994, Perception.

[11]  J. Hochberg,et al.  A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  D M Levi,et al.  Perception of mirror symmetry reveals long‐range interactions between orientation‐selective cortical filters , 2000, Neuroreport.

[13]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Goodness of Regularity in Dot Patterns: Global Symmetry, Local Symmetry, and Their Interactions , 2007, Perception.

[15]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[16]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[17]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  A better approach to goodness: Reply to Wagemans (1999). , 1999 .

[18]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory. , 1984, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns , 1974 .

[20]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[21]  Arno Koning,et al.  Mental rotation depends on the number of objects rather than on the number of image fragments. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Max Wertheimer,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt , .

[23]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  The force of symmetry revisited: symmetry-to-noise ratios regulate (a)symmetry effects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Symmetry versus repetition in cyclopean vision: A microgenetic analysis , 2007, Vision Research.

[25]  H Pashler,et al.  Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. Bertamini,et al.  No within-object advantage for detection of rotation. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[27]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Detection of symmetry and repetition in one and two objects. Structures versus strategies. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[28]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  The structure of visual regularities , 1999 .

[29]  E. Leeuwenberg.  Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. , 1969, Psychological review.

[30]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[31]  Peter A. van der Helm,et al.  Transparallel processing by hyperstrings. , 2004 .

[32]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[34]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery , 1973 .

[35]  Arno Koning,et al.  Object-based connectedness facilitates matching , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  C. Tyler.  Theoretical issues in symmetry perception. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[37]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Gestalt Issues in Modern Neuroscience , 2002 .

[39]  Gert van der Vloed,et al.  Blobs strengthen repetition but weaken symmetry , 2003, Vision Research.

[40]  P. A. Van Der Helm,et al.  Accessibility: a criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual pattern codes , 1991 .

[41]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[42]  Jon Driver,et al.  Obligatory edge-assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection. , 1995 .

[43]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  Peter Wenderoth.  The Effects of the Contrast Polarity of Dot-Pair Partners on the Detection of Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Perception.

[45]  Elmer Culler,et al.  Die physischen gestalten in ruhe und im station?ren zustand. , 1926 .

[46]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.

[47]  E. Leeuwenberg.  A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[48]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[49]  Harold Pashler,et al.  No role for colour in symmetry perception , 1999, Nature.

[50]  B. Pascal,et al.  PASCAL'S “PENSÉES” , 1961 .

[51]  C. Tyler.  Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[52]  A. R. Koning,et al.  From interpretation to segmentation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[54]  R van Lier,et al.  Integrating Global and Local Aspects of Visual Occlusion , 1994, Perception.

[55]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  Holographic goodness is not that bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater and Watson (2004) , 2004 .

[56]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Effects of physical connectivity on the representational unity of multi-part configurations , 1998, Cognition.