The neuroscience of conceptual learning in science and mathematics

Learning new concepts in mathematics and science often involves inhibiting prior beliefs or direct perceptual information. Recent neuroimaging work suggests that experts simply get better at inhibiting these pre-potent responses rather than replacing prior concepts with the newer concepts. A review of both behavioral and neuroimaging evidence with children suggests that improving inhibitory control is a key factor in learning new scientific and mathematical facts. This finding has implications for how these subjects are taught in the classroom and provides corroborating evidence for practices already in place.

[1]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[2]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  V. Menon,et al.  Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[4]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Differences in Brain Activation between Novices and Experts in Science during a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity. , 2014 .

[5]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[6]  B. Luna,et al.  What has fMRI told us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence? , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[8]  Susan Carey,et al.  Science Education as Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[9]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[10]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications , 2011 .

[11]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics? , 2015, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[12]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Brain Regions That Represent Amodal Conceptual Knowledge , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Conceptual Change and Education , 2007, Human Development.

[14]  N. Tzourio-mazoyer,et al.  Neural foundations of logical and mathematical cognition , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  M. Greenberg,et al.  The Mediational Role of Neurocognition in the Behavioral Outcomes of a Social-Emotional Prevention Program in Elementary School Students: Effects of the PATHS Curriculum , 2006, Prevention Science.

[17]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum , 1995, Development and Psychopathology.

[19]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  A Unified Framework for Inhibitory Control Opinion , 2022 .

[21]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Syllogistic reasoning and belief-bias inhibition in school children: evidence from a negative priming paradigm. , 2006, Developmental science.

[22]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies , 2010 .

[23]  Lucy Cragg,et al.  The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic , 2015 .

[24]  A. Diamond,et al.  Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old , 2011, Science.

[25]  D. Klahr,et al.  Educational Interventions to Advance Children’s Scientific Thinking , 2011, Science.

[26]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Training attentional control and working memory - Is younger, better? , 2012 .

[27]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Taking working memory training from the laboratory into schools , 2013, Educational psychology.

[28]  Yihong Yang,et al.  A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control , 2002 .

[29]  O. Houdé,et al.  Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults: a developmental negative priming study. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[30]  S. Lea,et al.  The Making of Human Concepts , 2010 .

[31]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Do Naïve Theories Ever Go Away? Using Brain and Behavior to Understand Changes in Concepts , 2007 .

[32]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The Neural Organization of Semantic Control: TMS Evidence for a Distributed Network in Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Marc Joliot,et al.  Mapping numerical processing, reading, and executive functions in the developing brain: an fMRI meta-analysis of 52 studies including 842 children. , 2010, Developmental science.

[34]  Yong-Ju Kwon,et al.  Linking Brain Growth with the Development of Scientific Reasoning Ability and Conceptual Change during Adolescence , 2000 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Précis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[37]  Walter Schneider,et al.  The Brain’s Learning and Control Architecture , 2012 .

[38]  Camilla Gilmore,et al.  Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency , 2014, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[39]  Lucy Cragg,et al.  Teachers' Understanding of the Role of Executive Functions in Mathematics Learning , 2014, Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society.

[40]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[41]  S. Cappa,et al.  Conceptual knowledge in the brain: fMRI evidence for a featural organization , 2008, Brain Research.

[42]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[44]  Olivier Houdeé,et al.  Negative priming effect after inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task , 2001 .

[45]  David A. Medler,et al.  Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Overcoming Perceptual Features in Logical Reasoning: A Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Corinne Zimmerman.  The development of scientific reasoning skills. , 2000 .

[48]  Susan Carey,et al.  The effect of executive function on biological reasoning in young children: an individual differences study. , 2014, Child development.

[49]  T. Gliga,et al.  What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us about the Early Development of Visual Categories , 2007 .

[50]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. , 2005, Child development.

[51]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning , 2000 .

[52]  Corinne Zimmerman.  The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. , 2007 .

[53]  Laure Zago,et al.  Shifting from the Perceptual Brain to the Logical Brain: The Neural Impact of Cognitive Inhibition Training , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Mary Budd Rowe.  Pausing principles and their effects on reasoning in science , 1980 .

[55]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .

[56]  Emilio Ferrer,et al.  Fluid Reasoning and the Developing Brain , 2009, Frontiers in neuroscience.

[57]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  E. Heit,et al.  The role of diverse instruction in conceptual change. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[59]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Hippocampal–Prefrontal Engagement and Dynamic Causal Interactions in the Maturation of Children's Fact Retrieval , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.