Quantitative analysis of random migration of cells using time-lapse video microscopy.

Cell migration is a dynamic process, which is important for embryonic development, tissue repair, immune system function, and tumor invasion (1, 2). During directional migration, cells move rapidly in response to an extracellular chemotactic signal, or in response to intrinsic cues (3) provided by the basic motility machinery. Random migration occurs when a cell possesses low intrinsic directionality, allowing the cells to explore their local environment. Cell migration is a complex process, in the initial response cell undergoes polarization and extends protrusions in the direction of migration (2). Traditional methods to measure migration such as the Boyden chamber migration assay is an easy method to measure chemotaxis in vitro, which allows measuring migration as an end point result. However, this approach neither allows measurement of individual migration parameters, nor does it allow to visualization of morphological changes that cell undergoes during migration. Here, we present a method that allows us to monitor migrating cells in real time using video - time lapse microscopy. Since cell migration and invasion are hallmarks of cancer, this method will be applicable in studying cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro. Random migration of platelets has been considered as one of the parameters of platelet function (4), hence this method could also be helpful in studying platelet functions. This assay has the advantage of being rapid, reliable, reproducible, and does not require optimization of cell numbers. In order to maintain physiologically suitable conditions for cells, the microscope is equipped with CO(2) supply and temperature thermostat. Cell movement is monitored by taking pictures using a camera fitted to the microscope at regular intervals. Cell migration can be calculated by measuring average speed and average displacement, which is calculated by Slidebook software.

[1]  E. Manser,et al.  Stat3 promotes directional cell migration by regulating Rac1 activity via its activator βPIX , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[4]  H. Seppä,et al.  Role of collagen and fibronectin in neural crest cell adhesion and migration. , 1981, Developmental biology.

[5]  Joanna C. Porter,et al.  LFA-1-induced T cell migration on ICAM-1 involves regulation of MLCK-mediated attachment and ROCK-dependent detachment , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  P. Keely,et al.  R-Ras controls membrane protrusion and cell migration through the spatial regulation of Rac and Rho. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[8]  Gabor Csucs,et al.  Acquisition speed comparison of microscope software programs , 2011, Microscopy research and technique.

[9]  M. Burow,et al.  Dynamic regulation of ROCK in tumor cells controls CXCR4-driven adhesion events , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  M. Sporn,et al.  The tumour microenvironment as a target for chemoprevention , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  A. Orr,et al.  Thrombospondin signaling through the calreticulin/LDL receptor-related protein co-complex stimulates random and directed cell migration , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[12]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[13]  Yan Ping Yu,et al.  Myopodin-mediated suppression of prostate cancer cell migration involves interaction with zyxin. , 2006, Cancer research.

[14]  E. Goetzl,et al.  Modulation of the random migration of human platelets. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.