T-DesP: Destination Prediction Based on Big Trajectory Data

Destination prediction is very important in location-based services such as recommendation of targeted advertising location. Most current approaches always predict destination according to existing trip based on history trajectories. However, no existing work has considered the difference between the effects of passing-by locations and the destination in history trajectories, which seriously impacts the accuracy of predicted results as the destination can indicate the purpose of traveling. Meanwhile, the temporal information of history trajectories in destination prediction plays an important role. On one hand, the history trajectories in different periods also differ in the influence, e.g., the history trajectories from last week can reflect the status quo more accurately than the history trajectories two years ago. On the other hand, the history trajectories in different time slots reflect different facts of traffic and moving habits of people, e.g., visiting a restaurant in the daytime and visiting a bar at night. Although a huge amount of history trajectories can be achieved in the era of big data, it is still far from covering all the query trajectories since a road network is widely distributed and trajectory data is sparse. The temporal sensitivity of history trajectories highlights the sparsity problem even more. Therefore, we propose a novel model T-DesP to solve the aforementioned problems. The model is comprised of two modules: trajectory learning and destination prediction. In the module of trajectory learning, a novel method called the mirror absorbing Markov chain model is proposed for modeling the trajectories for isolating the destination. We build a transition tensor to deduce the transition probability between each location pair in a particular time slot. To address the data sparsity problem, we fill the missing values in transition tensor through a context-aware tensor decomposition approach. In the module of destination prediction, an absorbing tensor is derived from the filled transition tensor, and the theoretical model is established for destination prediction. The experiments prove the effectiveness and efficiency of T-DesP.

[1]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation , 2013, SIGIR.

[2]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Vehicle route prediction and time of arrival estimation techniques for improved transportation system management , 2003, IEEE IV2003 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8683).

[3]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Navigate like a cabbie: probabilistic reasoning from observed context-aware behavior , 2008, UbiComp.

[4]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Predestination: Inferring Destinations from Partial Trajectories , 2006, UbiComp.

[5]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Predestination: Where Do You Want to Go Today? , 2007, Computer.

[6]  Xing Xie,et al.  DesTeller: A System for Destination Prediction Based on Trajectories with Privacy Protection , 2013, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[7]  Christian S. Jensen,et al.  Similarity-based prediction of travel times for vehicles traveling on known routes , 2008, GIS '08.

[8]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Inferring High-Level Behavior from Low-Level Sensors , 2003, UbiComp.

[9]  Charles M. Grinstead,et al.  Introduction to probability , 1986, Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences.

[10]  J. Antonio García-Macías,et al.  Learning and user adaptation in location forecasting , 2013, UbiComp.

[11]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Learning and inferring transportation routines , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Chunyan Miao,et al.  Personalized point-of-interest recommendation by mining users' preference transition , 2013, CIKM.

[13]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Some help on the way: opportunistic routing under uncertainty , 2012, UbiComp.

[14]  Lorenzo Blanco,et al.  Future Locations Prediction with Uncertain Data , 2013, ECML/PKDD.

[15]  Tsutomu Terada,et al.  A destination prediction method using driving contexts and trajectory for car navigation systems , 2009, SAC '09.

[16]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Discovering Urban Functional Zones Using Latent Activity Trajectories , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[17]  Xing Xie,et al.  Destination prediction by sub-trajectory synthesis and privacy protection against such prediction , 2013, 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[18]  Brett Browning,et al.  Learning to Predict Driver Route and Destination Intent , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[19]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Discovering popular routes from trajectories , 2011, 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[20]  Thad Starner,et al.  Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Solving large scale linear prediction problems using stochastic gradient descent algorithms , 2004, ICML.

[22]  Luis González Abril,et al.  Trip destination prediction based on past GPS log using a Hidden Markov Model , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Vibhav Gogate,et al.  Modeling Transportation Routines using Hybrid Dynamic Mixed Networks , 2005, UAI.

[24]  Ling Chen,et al.  A system for destination and future route prediction based on trajectory mining , 2010, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[25]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  A User-Centered Location Model , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  Chengyang Zhang,et al.  Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories , 2009, GIS.

[27]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[28]  Takayuki Nakata,et al.  Mining traffic data from probe-car system for travel time prediction , 2004, KDD.

[29]  Gao Cong,et al.  Graph-based Point-of-interest Recommendation with Geographical and Temporal Influences , 2014, CIKM.