iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers)

Hill numbers (or the effective number of species) have been increasingly used to quantify the species/taxonomic diversity of an assemblage. The sample‐size‐ and coverage‐based integrations of rarefaction (interpolation) and extrapolation (prediction) of Hill numbers represent a unified standardization method for quantifying and comparing species diversity across multiple assemblages. We briefly review the conceptual background of Hill numbers along with two approaches to standardization. We present an R package iNEXT (iNterpolation/EXTrapolation) which provides simple functions to compute and plot the seamless rarefaction and extrapolation sampling curves for the three most widely used members of the Hill number family (species richness, Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity). Two types of biodiversity data are allowed: individual‐based abundance data and sampling‐unit‐based incidence data. Several applications of the iNEXT packages are reviewed: (i) Non‐asymptotic analysis: comparison of diversity estimates for equally large or equally complete samples. (ii) Asymptotic analysis: comparison of estimated asymptotic or true diversities. (iii) Assessment of sample completeness (sample coverage) across multiple samples. (iv) Comparison of estimated point diversities for a specified sample size or a specified level of sample coverage. Two examples are demonstrated, using the data (one for abundance data and the other for incidence data) included in the package, to illustrate all R functions and graphical displays.

[1]  A. Ellison,et al.  Experimentally testing the role of foundation species in forests: the Harvard Forest Hemlock Removal Experiment , 2010 .

[2]  Rk Colwell EstimateS : Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, v. 8.0. User's guide and application , 2005 .

[3]  Elizabeth L. Sander,et al.  Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies , 2014 .

[4]  Aaron M Ellison,et al.  Partitioning diversity. , 2010, Ecology.

[5]  N. Selva,et al.  From regional to global patterns in vertebrate scavenger communities subsidized by big game hunting , 2015 .

[6]  Matthew T. Boulanger,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Paradigmatic Class Richness Supports Greater Paleoindian Projectile-Point Diversity in the Southeast , 2016, American Antiquity.

[7]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Density compensation, species composition, and richness of ants on a neotropical elevational gradient , 2011 .

[8]  K. Uchida,et al.  Land abandonment and intensification diminish spatial and temporal β-diversity of grassland plants and herbivorous insects within paddy terraces , 2015 .

[9]  A. Chao,et al.  Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. , 2012, Ecology.

[10]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages , 2012 .

[11]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[12]  A. Classen,et al.  Changes in canopy structure and ant assemblages affect soil ecosystem variables as a foundation species declines , 2015 .

[13]  M. Hill Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .