Uncertainty estimation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy absolute dosimetry verification.

PURPOSE Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) represents an important method for improving RT. The IMRT relative dosimetry checks are well established; however, open questions remain in reference dosimetry with ionization chambers (ICs). The main problem is the departure of the measurement conditions from the reference ones; thus, additional uncertainty is introduced into the dose determination. The goal of this study was to assess this effect systematically. METHODS AND MATERIALS Monte Carlo calculations and dosimetric measurements with five different detectors were performed for a number of representative IMRT cases, covering both step-and-shoot and dynamic delivery. RESULTS Using ICs with volumes of about 0.125 cm(3) or less, good agreement was observed among the detectors in most of the situations studied. These results also agreed well with the Monte Carlo-calculated nonreference correction factors (c factors). Additionally, we found a general correlation between the IC position relative to a segment and the derived correction factor c, which can be used to estimate the expected overall uncertainty of the treatment. CONCLUSION The increase of the reference dose relative standard uncertainty measured with ICs introduced by nonreference conditions when verifying an entire IMRT plan is about 1-1.5%, provided that appropriate small-volume chambers are used. The overall standard uncertainty of the measured IMRT dose amounts to about 2.3%, including the 0.5% of reproducibility and 1.5% of uncertainty associated with the beam calibration factor. Solid state detectors and large-volume chambers are not well suited to IMRT verification dosimetry because of the greater uncertainties. An action level of 5% is appropriate for IMRT verification. Greater discrepancies should lead to a review of the dosimetric procedure, including visual inspection of treatment segments and energy fluence.

[1]  I. Kawrakow Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  F. Sánchez-Doblado,et al.  Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Quantitative dosimetric verification of an IMRT planning and delivery system. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  W. Neve,et al.  Diamond detector measurements near simulated air channels for narrow photon beams. , 1999 .

[5]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[6]  G. Hartmann,et al.  Micro ionization chamber dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications of dosimetric errors in the PTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[8]  T Pawlicki,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation for MLC-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[9]  G. Hartmann,et al.  An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  F. H. Attix,et al.  A theory of cavity ionization. , 1955, Radiation research.

[11]  Josep Sempau,et al.  Electron beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers: Monte Carlo calculations using the PENELOPE system. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  R Mohan,et al.  A Monte Carlo model of photon beams used in radiation therapy. , 1995, Medical physics.

[13]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  James A. Purdy,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  L Chen,et al.  Monitor unit calculation for Monte Carlo treatment planning , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Mohan,et al.  A method for photon beam Monte Carlo multileaf collimator particle transport. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  J. Seuntjens,et al.  Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams. , 2004, Medical physics.

[18]  T LoSasso,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated fields. , 1996, Medical physics.

[19]  A Piermattei,et al.  PTW-diamond detector: dose rate and particle type dependence. , 2000, Medical physics.

[20]  Monte Carlo dose verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. Seuntjens,et al.  Physical aspects of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery with very small photon beams (1.5 and 3 mm in diameter). , 2003, Medical physics.

[22]  C. De Wagter,et al.  The value of the PinPoint ion chamber for characterization of small field segments used in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Antonio Leal,et al.  Routine IMRT verification by means of an automated Monte Carlo simulation system. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  C C Ling,et al.  Relative profile and dose verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Evaluation of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code for interface dosimetry near high-Z media exposed to kilovolt and 60Co photons. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  G. Hartmann,et al.  Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.