Airport related emissions and impacts on air quality: Application to the Atlanta International Airport

In the last decade, air traffic has increased dramatically with a significant increase in emissions. Our goal is to quantify the impact of aircraft emissions on regional air quality, especially in regards to PM2.5 and ozone. Here the focus is on Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport which is the busiest airport in the world based on passenger traffic. First, aircraft PM2.5 emissions are estimated based on the Smoke Number (SN) by using the ‘‘first order’’ method. The Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) is used for gaseous species. PM2.5 emissions are estimated once based on the characteristic SN and a second time using the mode-specific SN. Further, aircraft emissions are processed in two ways: (1) allocating the emissions at the airport itself, and (2) by accounting for flight paths, mode, and plume rise. When the more conservative emission estimates are used (i.e, the characteristic SN estimates allocated to the airport), results suggest that Hartsfield–Jackson airport can have a maximum impact of 56 ppb on ozone with a 5 ppb average impact over most of the Atlanta area. PM2.5 impacts are also estimated to be quite large with a maximum local impact of 25m gm � 3 . Impacts over most of the Atlanta area are less than 4m gm � 3 . The second set of emissions with detailed spatial allocation leads to a less intense ozone impact with a maximum of 20 ppb and an average of less than 1 ppb. PM2.5 impacts, in this case, are about 1m gm � 3 within a radius of 16 km around the airport. The difference in these two results shows the importance of how aircraft emissions are treated. The impacts on ozone and PM2.5 of ground support equipment at the airport are smaller compared to the aircraft impacts, with a maximum impact of 2 ppb for ozone and 9m gm � 3 for PM2.5.

[1]  Klaus Schäfer,et al.  Determination of major combustion products in aircraft exhausts by FTIR emission spectroscopy , 1998 .

[2]  A. Russell,et al.  Integrated modeling for air quality assessment: The Southern Appalachians Mountains Initiative Project , 2002 .

[3]  S. Hanna,et al.  Monte carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables , 1998 .

[4]  Laurent Menut,et al.  Quantification of the impact of aircraft traffic emissions on tropospheric ozone over Paris area , 2004 .

[5]  D. Byun Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system , 1999 .

[6]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .

[7]  Bernhard Lechner,et al.  AIRCRAFT EMISSION MEASUREMENTS BY REMOTE SENSING METHODOLOGIES AT AIRPORTS , 2003 .

[8]  Nicolas Moussiopoulos,et al.  Assessing the impact of the New Athens airport to urban air quality with contemporary air pollution models , 1997 .

[9]  R. Henry,et al.  Identifying the impact of large urban airports on local air quality by nonparametric regression , 2004 .

[10]  A. Petzold,et al.  Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes , 2000 .

[11]  Robert Sausen,et al.  European scientific assessment of the atmospheric effects of aircraft emissions , 1998 .

[12]  G. Roelofs,et al.  Impact of aircraft NOx emissions on tropospheric ozone calculated with a chemistry-general circulation model: Sensitivity to higher hydrocarbon chemistry , 2002 .

[13]  Brian Kim,et al.  Final report: the use of LIDAR to characterize aircraft initial plume characteristics , 2004 .

[14]  A. Russell,et al.  Daily sampling of PM2.5 in Atlanta: Results of the first year of the Assessment of Spatial Aerosol Composition in Atlanta study , 2003 .

[15]  G. Bishop,et al.  Method for Commercial Aircraft Nitric Oxide Emission Measurements , 1999 .

[16]  Robert F. Sawyer,et al.  MOBILE SOURCES CRITICAL REVIEW 1998 NARSTO ASSESSMENT , 2000 .

[17]  U. Schumann,et al.  Ultrafine aerosol particles in aircraft plumes: In situ observations , 1998 .