The ISB model (infrastructure, service, behaviour): a tool for waste practitioners.

In response to the EU Landfill Directive and the challenge of mitigating climate change, the UK government (nationally and locally) must develop strategies and policies to reduce, recycle, compost and recover waste. Best practice services that yield high recycling rates, such as alternate weekly collections, are now largely mainstream in suitable areas. However, national recycling performance is short of what is needed; policy makers must look for innovative ways to meet challenging recycling targets. Increasingly, local authorities are using behaviour change interventions to encourage the public to recycle; these tend to be based on the premise that an individuals' behaviour is predetermined by their values. In practice, this has led to a host of initiatives that attempt to change individuals' behaviour without addressing situational barriers. In this paper, we argue that that a behaviour-centric approach has limited effectiveness. Using an analysis of the literature and studies that investigated recycling participation in the city of Portsmouth, we have identified three significant clusters that can facilitate effective recycling: infrastructure, service and behaviour (ISB). We present the ISB model - a tool that can be used by waste practitioners when planning interventions to maximise recycling to better understand the situation and context for behaviour. Analysis using the ISB model suggests that current best practice, "business as usual" interventions could realistically achieve a national recycling rate of 50%. If the UK is to move towards zero waste, policy makers must look "upstream" for interventions that change the situational landscape.

[1]  A. Darnton,et al.  Reference Report: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses , 2008 .

[2]  Ian D. Williams Recycling in a densely populated urban environment , 2008 .

[3]  S.W.K. van den Burg,et al.  Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience; the Social Organisation of Normality , 2004 .

[4]  Zoe Sofoulis Big Water, Everyday Water: A Sociotechnical Perspective , 2005 .

[5]  C. Knussen,et al.  An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities , 2004 .

[6]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Effective implementation of a marketing communications strategy for kerbside recycling: a case study from Rushcliffe, UK , 2004 .

[7]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[8]  S. Schwartz Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[9]  K. Lucas,et al.  Promoting pro-environmental behaviour: existing evidence and policy implications , 2008 .

[10]  Darren Perrin,et al.  Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes , 2001 .

[11]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[12]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  A comparison of intended and claimed recycling behaviour to actual in a new kerbside scheme , 2003 .

[13]  Adam D. Read,et al.  “A weekly doorstep recycling collection, I had no idea we could!”: Overcoming the local barriers to participation , 1999 .

[14]  Ian D. Williams Recycling behaviour in high-density housing: a case study , 2006 .

[15]  V. A. Harris,et al.  The Attribution of Attitudes , 1967 .

[16]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: Development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy , 2005 .

[17]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  P. Shaw,et al.  The potential of financial incentives to enhance householders' kerbside recycling behaviour. , 2008, Waste management.

[19]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  The impact of transient populations on recycling behaviour in a densely populated urban environment , 2009 .

[20]  P. Shaw,et al.  Nearest neighbour effects in kerbside household waste recycling , 2008 .

[21]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change , 2008 .

[22]  Philip H. Byer,et al.  EFFECT OF DESIGN VARIABLES ON PARTICIPATION IN RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAMS , 1997 .

[23]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[24]  J. Corraliza,et al.  Environmental Values, Beliefs, and Actions , 2000 .

[25]  A. D. A. Kat De Angelino,et al.  The Construction of Society , 1931 .

[26]  Jill K. Jesson,et al.  Constraints, barriers or just plain excuses , 2008 .

[27]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  The participation of ethnic minorities in kerbside recycling: a case study , 2007 .

[28]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[29]  Julian Parfitt Analysis of household waste composition and factors driving waste increases , 2002 .

[30]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[31]  Peter Tucker,et al.  Normative Influences in Household Waste Recycling , 1999 .

[32]  Jane L. Price The landfill directive and the challenge ahead: demands and pressures on the UK householder , 2001 .

[33]  E. Kals,et al.  Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature , 1999 .

[34]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study , 2006 .

[35]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[36]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Kerbside collection: A case study from the north-west of England , 2007 .

[37]  Nicholas Ford,et al.  Attitudes towards Recycling Household Waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches , 2003 .