Packaging waste prevention activities: A life cycle assessment of the effects on a regional waste management system

A life cycle assessment was carried out to evaluate the effects of two packaging waste prevention activities on the overall environmental performance of the integrated municipal waste management system of Lombardia region, Italy. The activities are the use of refined tap water instead of bottled water for household consumption and the substitution of liquid detergents packaged in single-use containers by those distributed ‘loose’ through self-dispensing systems and refillable containers. A 2020 baseline scenario without waste prevention is compared with different waste prevention scenarios, where the two activities are either separately or contemporaneously implemented, by assuming a complete substitution of the traditional product(s). The results show that, when the prevention activities are carried out effectively, a reduction in total waste generation ranging from 0.14% to 0.66% is achieved, corresponding to a 1–4% reduction of the affected packaging waste fractions (plastics and glass). However, the improvements in the overall environmental performance of the waste management system can be far higher, especially when bottled water is substituted. In this case, a nearly 0.5% reduction of the total waste involves improvements ranging mostly between 5 and 23%. Conversely, for the substitution of single-use packaged liquid detergents (0.14% reduction of the total waste), the achieved improvements do not exceed 3% for nearly all impact categories.

[1]  Julian Cleary,et al.  A life cycle assessment of residential waste management and prevention , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives. , 2014, Waste management.

[3]  Lucia Rigamonti,et al.  Waste prevention in liquid detergent distribution: a comparison based on life cycle assessment. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Discussion on methods to include prevention activities in waste management LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Junya Yano,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Lucia Rigamonti,et al.  LCA of waste prevention activities: a case study for drinking water in Italy. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  David C Wilson,et al.  Editorial. Waste prevention: its time has come. , 2010, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[8]  Roland Clift,et al.  The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology , 2000 .

[9]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Julian Cleary,et al.  The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues , 2010 .

[11]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  LCA for household waste management when planning a new urban settlement. , 2012, Waste management.

[12]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Improving integrated waste management at the regional level: The case of Lombardia , 2013, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[13]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[14]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention. , 2011, Waste management.

[15]  Jens Aage Hansen Waste Management and Research: Editorial , 2009 .

[16]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Influence of assumptions about selection and recycling efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems , 2009 .