Reprint of: Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: A response to Dietrich, et al.

[1]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer health effects is the exception, not the rule , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[2]  L. Giudice,et al.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. , 2009, Endocrine reviews.

[3]  T J Woodruff,et al.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society. , 2012, Endocrinology.

[4]  L. Birnbaum.  Environmental Chemicals: Evaluating Low-Dose Effects , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  G. B. Gori,et al.  Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles. , 2013, Chemico-biological interactions.

[6]  Kristina A Thayer,et al.  Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. , 2012, Endocrine reviews.

[8]  D. Sheehan.  No-threshold dose-response curves for nongenotoxic chemicals: findings and applications for risk assessment. , 2006, Environmental research.

[9]  K. Wallen.  The Organizational Hypothesis: Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Phoenix, Goy, Gerall, and Young (1959) , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[10]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors , 2013, Environmental Health.

[11]  L S McCarty,et al.  The human relevant potency threshold: reducing uncertainty by human calibration of cumulative risk assessments. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  Åke Bergman,et al.  State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012 , 2012 .

[13]  R. Preston,et al.  Application of Key Events Analysis to Chemical Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[14]  A. Piersma,et al.  Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[15]  Mario Clerici,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and pediatric asthma in children: a case–control study , 2013, Environmental Health.

[16]  P. Grandjean,et al.  Transparency and translation of science in a modern world , 2013, Environmental Health.

[17]  Julie E Goodman,et al.  Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-responses of endocrine disrupting chemicals: has the case been made? , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology. , 2013, Reproductive toxicology.

[19]  W. C. Young,et al.  Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. , 1959, Endocrinology.