Infrastructure planning is increasingly confronted with a dynamic environment and an engaged society. This necessitates decision makers to interact with their environment, resulting in the adoption of adaptive and participative planning approaches such as combined infrastructure and (organic) area development (De Roo et al., 2020). Giving room to stakeholders and to unforeseen developments implies incorporating uncertainty in planning and decision making and increases the complexity of planning. In current infrastructure planning, decision makers seem to struggle to find a balance between giving room to uncertainties on the one hand, and keeping the decision-making process manageable on the other hand. This often results in attempts to reduce uncertainties, in 'certainification' (Van Asselt et al., 2007; Klijn & Koppenjan, 2016). This focus on certainification prevents adaptive and participative approaches in planning from reaching full maturity (Hajer et al., 2010; Albrechts, 2012).
[1]
P. Leroy,et al.
Environmental outlooks: How they frame futures and long term uncertainty
,
2016
.
[2]
Louis Albrechts,et al.
Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective
,
2013
.
[3]
Jos Arts,et al.
Integration in Dutch planning of motorways: From "line" towards "area-oriented" approaches
,
2012
.
[4]
Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.
Evaluating Adaptive Policymaking using expert opinions
,
2012
.
[5]
M. Hisschemöller,et al.
Science in Wadden Sea policy: from accommodation to advocacy
,
2008
.
[6]
S. Klooster,et al.
Dealing with prognostic uncertainty
,
2007
.
[7]
Johan Woltjer,et al.
The 'Public Support Machine': Notions of the Function of Participatory Planning by Dutch Infrastructure Planners
,
2002
.
[8]
Geert Teisman,et al.
Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds
,
2000
.