Diffusion of Open Access: Why are some disciplines more successful than others?

Since the first international statement on open access – the Budapest Open Access Initiative in February 2002, a growing number of open access publishing outlets have become available, and several policies in the European Union and the U.S. have been introduced to mandate the open access archiving of publicly funded research. In spite of these strides, research practices today are still far from completely embracing the open access movement. In this research in progress, we draw on models of the diffusion of changes in institutional practices across networks in order to understand how open source practices of unrestricted access to information and ideas have spread in the academic and research disciplines – in short, the diffusion of open access models of research dissemination across disciplines.

[1]  John Willinsky,et al.  The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science , 2005, First Monday.

[2]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[3]  K. Albert,et al.  Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  Lisa A. Ennis The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  James Allen,et al.  Interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories , 2005 .

[8]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[9]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[10]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact , 2005, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[11]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[12]  V. Ginsburgh,et al.  Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe , 2006 .

[13]  Alma Swan,et al.  The culture of Open Access: researchers’ views and responses , 2006 .

[14]  Les Carr,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .