Diffusion of Open Access: Why are some disciplines more successful than others?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] John Willinsky,et al. The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science , 2005, First Monday.
[2] R. Greenwood,et al. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .
[3] K. Albert,et al. Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[4] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .
[5] Lisa A. Ennis. The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[6] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[7] James Allen,et al. Interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories , 2005 .
[8] R. Greenwood,et al. Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .
[9] Charles D. Barrett. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .
[10] Stevan Harnad,et al. Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact , 2005, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..
[11] R. Greenwood,et al. Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .
[12] V. Ginsburgh,et al. Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe , 2006 .
[13] Alma Swan,et al. The culture of Open Access: researchers’ views and responses , 2006 .
[14] Les Carr,et al. The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .