Bayesian predictive modeling for genomic based personalized treatment selection

Efforts to personalize medicine in oncology have been limited by reductive characterizations of the intrinsically complex underlying biological phenomena. Future advances in personalized medicine will rely on molecular signatures that derive from synthesis of multifarious interdependent molecular quantities requiring robust quantitative methods. However, highly parameterized statistical models when applied in these settings often require a prohibitively large database and are sensitive to proper characterizations of the treatment-by-covariate interactions, which in practice are difficult to specify and may be limited by generalized linear models. In this article, we present a Bayesian predictive framework that enables the integration of a high-dimensional set of genomic features with clinical responses and treatment histories of historical patients, providing a probabilistic basis for using the clinical and molecular information to personalize therapy for future patients. Our work represents one of the first attempts to define personalized treatment assignment rules based on large-scale genomic data. We use actual gene expression data acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas in the settings of leukemia and glioma to explore the statistical properties of our proposed Bayesian approach for personalizing treatment selection. The method is shown to yield considerable improvements in predictive accuracy when compared to penalized regression approaches.

[1]  Eric B. Laber,et al.  A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes , 2012, Biometrics.

[2]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Cui,et al.  Wetland Degradation and Ecological Restoration , 2013, The Scientific World Journal.

[4]  Zachary D. Cohen,et al.  The Personalized Advantage Index: Translating Research on Prediction into Individualized Treatment Recommendations. A Demonstration , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Mark J. Ratain,et al.  Measuring response in a post-RECIST world: from black and white to shades of grey , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.  Evaluating Markers for Selecting a Patient's Treatment , 2004, Biometrics.

[7]  Yuri Kotliarov,et al.  Unsupervised analysis of transcriptomic profiles reveals six glioma subtypes. , 2009, Cancer research.

[8]  Matthew D. Wilkerson,et al.  ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking , 2010, Bioinform..

[9]  Holly Janes,et al.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations , 2014, Biometrics.

[10]  Lewis C Cantley,et al.  A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[11]  R. Simon,et al.  On the efficiency of targeted clinical trials , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  Consensus Clustering: A Resampling-Based Method for Class Discovery and Visualization of Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2003, Machine Learning.

[13]  J. Ibrahim,et al.  On Optimality Properties of the Power Prior , 2003 .

[14]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  B. Alberts,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell 4th edition , 2007 .

[16]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  Survival Analysis by Penalized Regression and Matrix Factorization , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[19]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[20]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[21]  K. Archer,et al.  L 1 penalized continuation ratio models for ordinal response prediction using high‐dimensional datasets , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Mark J. Ratain,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic , 2013, Nature.

[23]  S. Knox From 'omics' to complex disease: a systems biology approach to gene-environment interactions in cancer , 2010, Cancer Cell International.

[24]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development , 2008, Clinical trials.

[25]  Renaud Gaujoux,et al.  A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[26]  C. Sigman,et al.  Cancer biomarkers: selecting the right drug for the right patient , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[28]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials , 2013, Nature.

[29]  Filip Lardon,et al.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy. , 2010, The oncologist.