Short-Term Storage and the Processing of Cohesion during Reading

Four studies examine the role of short-term storage in the processing of grammatical cohesion devices (reference and conjunction) during reading. They demonstrate that short-term storage carries specific information that resolves reference and conjunction relations demanded by text. They also show that during reading, if short-term storage is unimpaired, these linkages produce smooth, efficient performance. If, however, short-term storage is cleared of its contents with a distractor task, reading is disrupted. The extent of the disruption is determined, in part, by the linkage demands of the text. It is theorized that this occurs because resolution of linkage takes place in short-term storage. Both indirect and direct evidence is also obtained that short-term storage is carrying higher-order thematic information. The first three studies demonstrate that a range of distractor tasks produces the basic results. The fourth study compares the effects of different distractor tasks and permits the specification of different types of information held in short-term storage during reading. A linear model of the process is fitted to the data. It assigns time values to four factors that determine the rate of reading.

[1]  Joseph E. Grimes,et al.  The Thread of Discourse , 1984 .

[2]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Determinants of processing for a propositional structure , 1980 .

[3]  Alan M. Lesgold,et al.  Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension , 1979 .

[4]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[5]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  Understanding Anaphora: Rules Used by Readers in Assigning Pronominal Referents. Technical Report No. 3, December 1, 1976 through July 1, 1980. , 1981 .

[6]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Kieras Component processes in the comprehension of simple prose , 1981 .

[8]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[9]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  The Scheduling of Text Integration Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[10]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Short-term storage in the processing of text , 1981 .

[11]  Abe Lockman,et al.  Toward a procedural model of contextual reference resolution , 1980 .

[12]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Repetitions of propositional arguments in sentences , 1976 .

[13]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[14]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[15]  L. Nilsson Perspectives on memory research , 1979 .

[16]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Short-term storage in reading. , 1984 .

[17]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory , 1979 .

[18]  Judith Westpbal Irwin The Effect of Linguistic Cohesion on Prose Comprehension , 1980 .

[19]  M. Halliday NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .