The European Court of Justice on the EU-Morocco agricultural and fisheries agreements: an analysis of the legal proceedings and consequences for the actors involved

ABSTRACT Over the past few years, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued several judgments on the international agreements between the European Union (EU) and Morocco and their territorial scope, including the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara. This study examines cases C-104/16 P and C-266/16 concerning, respectively, the Agricultural Agreement and the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and the Kingdom of Morocco, both of which have revealed a tug-of-war between the judiciary and the legislative and executive powers of the EU regarding the Western Sahara conflict. While the highest European legal authority stated that Western Sahara has a separate and distinct status from Morocco, the Parliament, Commission, and Council have persisted in their long-standing position of viewing the conflict as a result of postcolonial relations between France and Spain, on the one hand, and the Alawite kingdom, on the other. This article analyses the two cases at both the procedural and political levels, in addition to their consequences with regard to the positioning of the actors involved to show that, in the case of the Western Sahara conflict, EU economic and geopolitical interests have prevailed over the application of European and international law.

[1]  K. Kaiser.  EU-Morocco Negotiations ona Readmission Agreement:Obstacles to a Successful Conclusion. College of Europe EU diplomacy 07/2019 , 2019 .

[2]  J. Vega.  La guerra de los mundos : realidad versus formalismo jurídico o el poder de la interpretación (a propósito de la sentencia TJUE de 27 de febrero de 2018, Western Sahara Campaign UK , C-266/16) , 2018 .

[3]  Álvaro de Elera.  The Frente Polisario Judgments: An Assessment in the Light of the Court of Justice’s Case Law on Territorial Disputes , 2017 .

[4]  E. Kassoti.  The Empire Strikes Back: The Council Decision Amending Protocols 1 and 4 to the EU-Morocco Association Agreement , 2019 .

[5]  M. L. Grande-Gascón,et al.  The EU’s Reluctant Engagement with the Western Sahara Conflict: Between Humanitarian Aid and Parliamentary Involvement , 2017 .

[6]  S. Hummelbrunner,et al.  EU-Morocco Trade Relations Do Not Legally Affect Western Sahara - Case C-104/16 P Council v Front Polisario , 2017 .

[7]  Irene Fernández Molina.  La Unión Europea y el conflicto del Sahara occidental , 2016 .

[8]  Juan Soroeta Liceras.  La sentencia de 10 de diciembre de 2015 del Tribunal General de la UE (T-512/12), primer reconocimiento en vía judicial europea del estatuto del Sahara Occidental y de la subjetividad internacional del Frente Polisario , 2016 .

[9]  G. Loo.  Mapping out the scope and contents of the DCFTAs with Tunisia and Morocco , 2016 .

[10]  Miguel Angel Cepillo Galvín.  La zona de libre cambio Unión Europea-Marruecos, ¿un paso decisivo para la conclusión de un acuerdo de libre comercio amplio y profundo? , 2013 .

[11]  Michal Natorski.  The Meda Programme in Morocco 12 years on: results, experiencesand trends , 2008 .

[12]  Paul-Henri. Spaak.  Rapport des chefs de delegation aux Ministres des Affaires Etrangeres = Report of the Heads of Delegation to the Ministers of Foreign Affairs (21 April 1956). [Intergovernmental Committee on European Integration, commonly called the Spaak Report] , 1956 .