Preliminary Results from an Experimental Assessment of a Natural Laminar Flow Design Method

A 5.2% scale semispan model of the new Common Research Model with Natural Laminar Flow (CRM-NLF) was tested in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center. The model was tested at transonic cruise flight conditions with Reynolds numbers based on mean aerodynamic chord ranging from 10 to 30 million. The goal of the test was to experimentally validate a new design method, referred to as Crossflow Attenuated NLF (CATNLF), which shapes airfoils to have pressure distributions that delay transition on wings with high sweep and Reynolds numbers. Additionally, the test aimed to characterize the NTF laminar flow testing capabilities, as well as establish best practices for laminar flow wind tunnel testing. Preliminary results regarding the first goal of validating the new design method are presented in this paper. Experimental data analyzed in this assessment include surface pressure data and transition images. The surface pressure data acquired during the test agree well with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. Transition images at a variety of Reynolds numbers and angles of attack are presented and compared to computational transition predictions. The experimental data are used to assess transition due to a turbulent attachment line, as well as crossflow and Tollmien-Schlichting modal instabilities. Preliminary results suggest the CATNLF design method is successful at delaying transition on wings with high sweep. Initial analysis of the transition front images showed transition Reynolds numbers that exceed historic experimental values at similar sweep angles.

[1]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[2]  William S. Saric,et al.  Application of Drag Reduction Techniques to Transport Aircraft , 2015 .

[3]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  The NASA tetrahedral unstructured software system (TetrUSS) , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[4]  R. A. Wahls.  The National Transonic Facility: A Research Retrospective , 2001 .

[5]  Christian B Allen,et al.  48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition , 2010 .

[6]  J. Crouch,et al.  Boundary-Layer Transition Prediction for Laminar Flow Control (Invited) , 2015 .

[7]  R. A. Wahls.  The National Transonic Facility: A Research Retrospective (Invited) , 2001 .

[8]  Kyle Z. Goodman,et al.  Boundary-Layer Detection at Cryogenic Conditions Using Temperature Sensitive Paint Coupled with a Carbon Nanotube Heating Layer , 2016, Sensors.

[9]  Melissa B. Rivers,et al.  Assessment of the National Transonic Facility for Natural Laminar Flow Testing , 2010 .

[10]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Expanding the Natural Laminar Flow Boundary for Supersonic Transports , 2016 .

[11]  Yong-Sun Wie,et al.  BLSTA: A boundary layer code for stability analysis , 1992 .

[12]  Richard A. Wahls,et al.  Retrospective on the Common Research Model for Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation Studies , 2018, Journal of Aircraft.

[13]  D. I. A. Poll,et al.  Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of a long yawed cylinder , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Jenna L. Eppink,et al.  Flow Disturbance Measurements in the National Transonic Facility , 2014 .

[15]  M. Bruse,et al.  Combination of Temperature-Sensitive Paint and Carbon Nanotubes for Transition Detection , 2015 .

[16]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Computational Design and Analysis of a Transonic Natural Laminar Flow Wing for a Wind Tunnel Model , 2017 .

[17]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Efficient Viscous Design of Realistic Aircraft Configurations , 1998 .

[18]  Andrew T. Wick,et al.  Transonic Semispan Aerodynamic Testing of the Hybrid Wing Body with Over Wing Nacelles in the National Transonic Facility , 2017 .

[19]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Natural Laminar Flow Design for Wings with Moderate Sweep , 2016 .

[20]  Gregory S. Jones,et al.  Force Measurement Improvements to the National Transonic Facility Sidewall Model Support System , 2016 .

[21]  Kyle Z. Goodman,et al.  Transition Detection at Cryogenic Temperatures Using a Carbon-Based Resistive Heating Layer Coupled with Temperature Sensitive Paint , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[22]  Sally A. Viken,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the NASA Common Research Model with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[23]  Robert R. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Wing Sweep on In-flight Boundary-layer Transition for a Laminar Flow Wing at Mach Numbers from 0.60 to 0.79 , 1990 .

[24]  Marvine Hamner.  Using Temperature Sensitive Paint Technology , 2002 .

[25]  Michimasa Fujino.  Design and Development of the HondaJet , 2003 .

[26]  D Joslin Ronald,et al.  Overview of Laminar Flow Control , 1998 .

[27]  Gregory M. Gatlin,et al.  Recent Improvements in Semi-Span Testing at the National Transonic Facility (Invited) , 2006 .

[28]  Chau-Lyan Chang,et al.  The Langley Stability and Transition Analysis Code (LASTRAC) : LST, Linear and Nonlinear PSE for 2-D, Axisymmetric, and Infinite Swept Wing Boundary Layers , 2003 .

[29]  R. L. Campbell,et al.  Building a Practical Natural Laminar Flow Design Capability , 2017 .