Factors affecting the recognition of reverberant speech by elderly listeners.

Elderly listeners have been shown to experience greater difficulty with speech understanding than young listeners. The greater difficulty with speech understanding in elderly listeners has been attributed, primarily, to their typical high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment. However, not all of the observed difficulty can be accounted for by hearing thresholds, leaving the likelihood of additional suprathreshold processing deficits. This study investigates speech understanding in older people and the relative contributions of hearing threshold and age to speech understanding. Considering that temporal processing is thought to affect speech understanding, the study also assesses the contributions of hearing loss and age to modulation-preservation performance. Finally, individual differences in hearing loss, age, and modulation-preservation performance are examined to see if they are closely associated with individual differences in speech-recognition ability, especially among older listeners. The results of the study suggest that hearing loss is closely tied to both speech-recognition performance and to measures of modulation preservation. Although some of the analyses at first indicated an effect of age, it was shown that this could be attributed in part to slight elevations in hearing threshold. Finally, it was shown that individual differences in hearing loss and measures of modulation preservation and processing efficiency in noise are associated with speech-recognition performance and that, given these measures, speech recognition can be predicted quite accurately.

[1]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  Audiological Correlates of Speech Understanding Deficits in Elderly Listeners with Mild‐to‐Moderate Hearing Loss. II. Correlation Analysis , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[2]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  C Elberling,et al.  Temporal integration of acoustic energy in patients with presbyacusis. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  C. Formby,et al.  Differential sensitivity to tonal frequency and to the rate of modulation of broad-band noise by hearing-impaired listeners , 1982 .

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The role of talker‐specific information in memory for spoken sentences , 1994 .

[6]  T Houtgast,et al.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  L. Humes,et al.  Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Walt Jesteadt Modeling sensorineural hearing loss , 1997 .

[11]  D. A. Nelson,et al.  Auditory time constants for off-frequency forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J H Grose,et al.  Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Age-associated degeneration of backward masking task performance: evidence of declining temporal resolution abilities in normal listeners. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  K. Helfer,et al.  Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  P L Divenyi,et al.  Audiological Correlates of Speech Understanding Deficits in Elderly Listeners with Mild‐to‐Moderate Hearing Loss. I. Age and Lateral Asymmetry Effects , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[18]  P E Souza,et al.  Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C W Turner,et al.  Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  S. Schor STATISTICS: AN INTRODUCTION. , 1965, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  J Jerger,et al.  Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[23]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. House,et al.  A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory duration discrimination in young and elderly listeners with normal hearing. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[28]  L E Humes,et al.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  T. Houtgast,et al.  A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .

[30]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  T Frank,et al.  Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[32]  L. Marshall,et al.  Prediction of Speech Discrimination Scores from Audiometric Data , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[33]  T. Houtgast,et al.  The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .

[34]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[36]  H. Levitt,et al.  Phoneme errors on a nonsense syllable test , 1975 .

[37]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  L E Humes,et al.  Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[39]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[41]  S P Bacon,et al.  Masking by modulated and unmodulated noise: effects of bandwidth, modulation rate, signal frequency, and masker level. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  The modulated-unmodulated difference: effects of signal frequency and masker modulation depth. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  K Schorn,et al.  Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[45]  L E Humes,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  P L Divenyi,et al.  Audiological Correlates of Speech Understanding Deficits in Elderly Listeners with Mild‐to‐Moderate Hearing Loss. III. Factor Representation , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[47]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  J. P. Egan Articulation testing methods , 1948, The Laryngoscope.

[50]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[51]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[52]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  L. Humes Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[54]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[55]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  L E Humes,et al.  Modulation transfer functions: a comparison of the results of three methods. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[57]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[58]  M. Florentine,et al.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  L E Humes,et al.  Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  L E Humes,et al.  Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[61]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.