Strategies, Interaction and Stance in Conference Language: ESP Presentations Made by Non-Native English Speakers

Academic conferences have become an important rite of passage for academics to develop their professionalism and obtain promotion. Nowadays, conferences are a venue not only for exploiting, exchanging or sharing knowledge, but also for building connections, carrying out academic/commercial promotion, and even selling products or services. Conferences are without a doubt important activities in researchers' lives, and a significant element in the development of their research profiles. Thus, full understanding of conference language and its component genres can help scholars become well-situated members of their discourse communities. Yet, compared to the extensive research on written academic discourse, studies on spoken academic discourse are underrepresented, and conference presentations (CPs) are one of the less explored but truly essential genres for academic researchers. Thus, to meet this research need, the present study attempts to examine how non-native English speakers present and interact in a CP, specifically concentrating on Mandarin Chinese speakers, the largest linguistic group learning English nowadays. A total of 44 presentations on ESP issues delivered at an international conference were observed, focusing on how the speakers interacted with the audience and how they presented their stance in their CPs. The results indicate that, first, the speakers intentionally deployed certain lexical devices to ensure that their presentations were delivered coherently, and relied on both verbal and physical devices to direct the audience's attention to the projected semiotic images. Second, the ambience of interacting with the audience changed from a rigid formality to lively variety as the CP progressed. Third, the feature of shifting from an impersonal voice to a more personal tone in their CPs was deliberately adopted by the speakers to build up interpersonal connections and a personal reputation in the research community. Pedagogical implications for teaching ESP and suggestions for future studies are also provided.

[1]  Betty Samraj,et al.  Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines , 2002 .

[2]  Pauline Webber Interactive features in medical conference monologue , 2005 .

[3]  The peer seminar, a spoken research process genre , 2004 .

[4]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse , 2005 .

[5]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .

[6]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Academic Listening: Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension – an overview , 1995 .

[7]  Anna Mauranen,et al.  "It`s just real messy": the occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech , 2001 .

[8]  H. Nesi Laughter in university lectures , 2012 .

[9]  Shirley Carter-Thomas,et al.  Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), A methodological overview of a multimodal genre , 2003 .

[10]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[11]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[12]  Celia Shalom,et al.  Established and Evolving Spoken Research Process Genres: Plenary Lecture and Poster Session Discussions at Academic Conferences. , 1993 .

[13]  Kjersti Fløttum Variation of Stance and Voice across Cultures , 2012 .

[14]  Jiemin Bu Towards a pragmatic analysis of metadiscourse in academic lectures: From relevance to adaptation , 2014 .

[15]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and voice in written academic genres , 2012 .

[16]  P. Gu Fine Brush and Freehand: The Vocabulary-Learning Art of Two Successful Chinese EFL Learners. , 2003 .

[17]  A. Hewings Stance and Voice in Academic Discourse across Channels , 2012 .

[18]  M. Silver Voice and Stance across Disciplines in Academic Discourse , 2012 .

[19]  Wen-Hsien Yang,et al.  Stance and engagement: A corpus-based analysis of academic spoken discourse across science domains , 2014 .

[20]  Shirley Carter-Thomas,et al.  Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy: Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting , 2005 .

[21]  A closer look at laughter in academic talk: A reader response , 2014 .

[22]  Shirley Carter-Thomas,et al.  If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice , 2008 .

[23]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[24]  Betty Lou Dubois,et al.  “Something on the order of around forty to forty-four”: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks , 1987, Language in Society.

[25]  Anna Mauranen They're a little bit different...: Observations on hedges in academic talk , 2004 .

[26]  Mark Powell Presenting in English: How to Give Successful Presentations , 1996 .