Influence of blood vessel conductivity in cochlear implant stimulation using a finite element head model

It is known that the inclusion of blood vessels in finite element (FE) models can influence the current conduction results. However, there have been no studies exploring the impact of blood vessel conductivity on human head models for cochlear implant (CI) stimulation. The three-dimensional (3D) FE model presented in this paper aims to provide understanding in this regard. The electrical conductivity of blood was varied to determine the sensitivity of the 3D model. The results show that some of the current is exiting the cochlea and taking the jugular vein pathway. When compared to the case with blood vessels being omitted, the current density in the blood increased by 13.1%, 17.2% and 20.7% for low, medium and high electrical conductivity cases considered, respectively. This study suggests that blood vessels cannot be neglected from CI models as the jugular vein can provide a low impedance pathway, through which current can leave the cochlea. It also indicates the importance of using correct tissue property values for performing accurate bioelectric modeling analyses.

[1]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea , 2006, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[2]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Realistic Computer Modelling of Electric and Magnetic Fields of Human Head and Torso , 1998, Parallel Comput..

[4]  Phillip Tran,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Current Flow from Cochlear Implant Stimulation , 2011 .

[5]  D.R. Jackson,et al.  Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J N Sahalos,et al.  A realistic three dimensional FEM of the human head. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[7]  V. Spitzer,et al.  The visible human dataset: The anatomical platform for human simulation , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[8]  L H Mens,et al.  Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  R. Sadleir,et al.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[12]  P. Carter,et al.  Incorporating vascular structure into electric volume conduction models of the cochlea , 2012, 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences.

[13]  S. K. Law,et al.  Thickness and resistivity variations over the upper surface of the human skull , 2005, Brain Topography.

[14]  Johan Frijns,et al.  The Facial Nerve Canal: An Important Cochlear Conduction Path Revealed by Clarion Electrical Field Imaging , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[16]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  Effect of white matter anisotropy in modeling electroconvulsive therapy , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  P. Wen,et al.  Effects of local tissue conductivity on spherical and realistic head models , 2010, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[18]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[20]  Kenneth Saul Krane,et al.  Physics, Volume 2 , 1986 .

[21]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Engineering Design of Cochlear Implants , 2004 .

[22]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.