Setting priorities in energy innovation policy: lessons for the UK

The views expressed within this paper are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of the The overarching objective of the Energy Technology Innovation Policy (ETIP) research group is to determine and then seek to promote adoption of effective strategies for developing and deploying cleaner and more efficient energy technologies, primarily in three of the biggest energy-consuming nations in the world: the United States, China, and India. These three countries have enormous influence on local, regional, and global environmental conditions through their energy production and consumption. ETIP researchers seek to identify and promote strategies that these countries can pursue, separately and collaboratively, for accelerating the development and deployment of advanced energy options that can reduce conventional air pollution, minimize future greenhouse-gas emissions, reduce dependence on oil, facilitate poverty alleviation, and promote economic development. ETIP's focus on three crucial countries rather than only one not only multiplies directly our leverage on the world scale and facilitates the pursuit of cooperative efforts, but also allows for the development of new insights from comparisons and contrasts among conditions and strategies in the three cases. Executive Summary The transition towards more sustainable, low carbon societies will require the development and deployment of a range of new and existing energy technologies. These include centralised supply side options such as carbon capture and storage, infrastructure technologies such as decentralised energy networks, and technologies adopted by consumers such as LED lighting, cleaner vehicles and micro-generation. This paper analyses the role of governments in supporting this process and draws on experience from Europe, the USA and Japan. The paper's starting point is the common assertion that governments should avoid providing targeted support to particular technologies. Instead, they should set general frameworks to encourage more sustainable innovation, for example by creating carbon markets. The practice of 'picking winners' should therefore be avoided because governments are not best placed to decide which technologies to fund. 3 The paper challenges this argument on a number of grounds. First, the resources that governments can devote to sustainable energy innovation are limited. If there is no attempt to prioritise how these resources are used, there is a risk that they will be spread too thinly. Second, the urgency of climate change means that innovation and deployment may be too slow if there is an excessive reliance on the carbon market. Carbon markets such as the EU emissions trading scheme are in their …

[1]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS): Exploring the Research, Development, Demonstration, and Deployment Continuum , 2005 .

[2]  Lewis M. Branscomb,et al.  Investing in innovation : creating a research and innovation policy that works , 1998 .

[3]  M. Grubb Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options , 2004 .

[4]  Erwann O. Michel-Kerjan,et al.  A New Energy Paradigm Ensuring Nuclear Fuel Supply and Nonproliferation through International Collaboration with Insurance and Financial Markets , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  The risk of surprise in energy technology costs , 2007 .

[6]  Linda J. Bilmes,et al.  The Economic Costs of the Iraq War: An Appraisal Three Years after the Beginning of the Conflict , 2006 .

[7]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[8]  A. Chikkatur,et al.  Cleaner Power in India: Towards a Clean-Coal-Technology Roadmap , 2007 .

[9]  Simon Saradzhyan,et al.  Disrupting Escalation of Terror in Russia to Prevent Catastrophic Attacks , 2005 .

[10]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[11]  David L. Greene,et al.  HOW MUCH IS ENERGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT WORTH AS INSURANCE? , 1999 .

[12]  John Metcalfe Policy for Innovation , 2007 .

[13]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  The Economics of Energy Efficiency , 2004 .

[14]  W. Ross Morrow,et al.  Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Analysis of Policies to Reduce Oil Consumption and , 2008 .

[15]  Monica Duffy Toft,et al.  Religion, Civil War, and International Order , 2006 .

[16]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Innovation for a low carbon economy : economic, institutional and management approaches , 2008 .

[17]  P. Robinson,et al.  Competing in the global economy - the innovation challenge , 2004 .

[18]  Robert H. Socolow Stabilization Wedges: Mitigation Tools for the Next Half - Century , 2005 .

[19]  D. Kammen,et al.  U.S. energy research and development: Declining investment, increasing need, and the feasibility of expansion , 2007 .

[20]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[21]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The political economy of sustainable energy , 2007 .

[22]  Erica Chenoweth,et al.  The Inadvertent Effects of Democracy on Terrorist Group Emergence , 2006 .

[23]  H. Vos Trade and Industry , 1946 .

[24]  Debyani Ghosh,et al.  Assessment of Advanced Coal-Based Electricity Generation Technology Options for India: Potential Learning from U.S. Experiences , 2005 .

[25]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[26]  A. Auliciems,et al.  Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2. Resources and Technology , 2000 .

[27]  Carol Werner,et al.  Committee on Energy and Natural Resources , 2008 .

[28]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[29]  John P. Holdren,et al.  Energy-Technology Innovation , 2006 .

[30]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological Change , 2019, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

[31]  Aie Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Germany 2007 , 2007 .

[32]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  From CoPS to mass production? Capabilities and innovation in power generation equipment manufacturing , 2005 .

[33]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Land-Use Change and Carbon Sinks: Econometric Estimation of the Carbon Sequestration Supply Function , 2005 .

[34]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  Governing Technology for Sustainability , 2006 .

[35]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[36]  Matthias Weber,et al.  Towards Environmental Innovation Systems , 2005 .

[37]  D. Kammen,et al.  Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge , 1999, Science.

[38]  B. Martin,et al.  Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners , 1984 .

[39]  John P. Holdren,et al.  Policy Options for Reducing Oil Consumption and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions from the U. S. Transportation Sector , 2007 .

[40]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[41]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  Coupling CO 2 Capture and Storage with Coal Gasification: Defining "Sequestration-Ready" IGCC , 2005 .

[42]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan , 2000 .

[43]  Smita Srinivas,et al.  Demand Policy Instruments for R&D: Procurement, Technical Standards and the Case of Indian Vaccines , 2004 .

[44]  A. D. Sa,et al.  Technological Change in the Indian Passenger Car Industry , 2004 .

[45]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Do Consumers React to the Shape of Supply? Water Demand under Heterogeneous Price Structures , 2005 .

[46]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[47]  Henry Lee,et al.  Dawning of a New Era: The Lng Story , 2005 .

[48]  P H Abelson,et al.  Energy for the future. , 1966, Science.

[49]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Seven Centuries of Energy Services: The Price and Use of Light in the United Kingdom (1300-2000)1 , 2006 .

[50]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[51]  A. Stirling On the economics and analysis of diversity , 1998 .

[52]  R. Venterea Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change , 2009 .

[53]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[54]  Michael Borrus,et al.  Technology Policy and Economic Growth , 1997 .

[55]  Pierre Bacher,et al.  Meeting the energy challenges of the 21st century , 2002 .

[56]  R. Stavins,et al.  The Effects of Vintage-Differentiated Environmental Regulation , 2005 .

[57]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Effects of Technological Change, Experience, and Environmental Regulation on the Construction Cost of Coal-Burning Generating Units , 1985 .

[58]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[59]  S. Brusoni,et al.  The economic returns to Basic Research and the Benefits of University-Industry Relationships , 2001 .

[60]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[61]  John M. Deutch,et al.  What should the government do to encourage technical change in the energy sector , 2005 .

[62]  Patrick James,et al.  Unlocking the power house: policy and system change for domestic micro-generation in the UK , 2006 .

[63]  J. Bielicki Returns to Scale in Carbon Capture and Storage Infrastructure and Deployment , 2008 .

[64]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[65]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution , 2002 .

[66]  Gordon MacKerron,et al.  Nuclear costs: Why do they keep rising? , 1992 .

[67]  B Wieczorek,et al.  The federal ministry for the environment, nature conservation and nuclear safety. , 1993, Schriftenreihe des Vereins fur Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene.