Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for men's gender-inconsistent success

Results of an experimental study varying the sex of the employee and the gender-type of the job demonstrated that men, as well as women, are penalized when they are successful in areas that imply that they have violated gender norms. But the nature of these penalties differed. When depicted as being successful at a female gender-typed job, men were characterized as more ineffectual and afforded less respect than women successful at the same job or than men successful in a gender-consistent position. Women, in contrast, were more interpersonally derogated and disliked when said to be successful at a male gender-typed job. Regardless of these differing characterizations, both men and women successful in gender-inconsistent jobs were reported to be less preferable as bosses than their more normatively consistent counterparts. These results suggest that success, when it violates gender norms, can be disadvantageous for both men and women, but in different ways.

[1]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market career strategy? , 1997 .

[2]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Heilman,et al.  Motivated to Penalize: Women's Strategic Rejection of Successful Women , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  M. Heilman,et al.  Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[6]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[7]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  What's good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: the benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Christine L. Williams.  The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the “Female” Professions , 1992 .

[9]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. , 2010 .

[10]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women , 2001 .

[11]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[12]  M. Heilman,et al.  Same behavior, different consequences: reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behavior. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  M. Heilman,et al.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  E. Borgida,et al.  Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination , 1999 .

[15]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations , 2008 .

[16]  M. Heilman,et al.  Gender Stereotypes in the Workplace: Obstacles to Women's Career Progress , 2007 .

[17]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. , 1995 .

[18]  M. Heilman.  Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. , 2001 .

[19]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.