Exploring optimal design of look-up table for PROSAIL model inversion with multi-angle MODIS data

Physical remote sensing model inversion based on look-up table (LUT) technique is promising for its good precision, high efficiency and easily-realization. However, scheme of the LUT is difficult to be well designed, as lacking a thorough investigation of its mechanism for different designs, for instance, the way the parameter space is sampled. To studying this problem, experiments on several LUT design schemes are performed and their effects on inversion results are analyzed in this paper. 1,000 groups of randomly generated parameters of PROSAIL model are taken to simulate multi-angle observations with the observation angles of MODIS sensor to be inversion data. The correlation coefficient (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) of input LAIs for simulation and estimated LAIs were calculated. The results show that, LUT size is a key factor, and the RMSE is lower than 0.25 when the size reaches 100,000; Selecting no more than 0.1% cases of the LUT as the solution with a size of 100,000 is usually valid and the RMSE is usually increased with the increasing of the percentage of selected cases; Taking the median of the selected solutions as the final solution is better than the mean or the “best” whose cost function value is the least; Different parameter distributions have a certain impact on the inversion results, and the results get better when using a normal distribution. Finally, winter wheat LAI of one research area in Xinxiang City, Henan Province of China is estimated with MODIS daily reflectance data, the validate result shows it works well.

[1]  W. Dorigo,et al.  A LUT APPROACH FOR BIOPHYSICAL PARAMETER RETRIEVAL BY RT MODEL INVERSION APPLIED TO WIDE FIELD OF VIEW DATA , 2005 .

[2]  A. Kuusk The Hot Spot Effect in Plant Canopy Reflectance , 1991 .

[3]  Wouter A. Dorigo,et al.  Improving the Robustness of Cotton Status Characterisation by Radiative Transfer Model Inversion of Multi-Angular CHRIS/PROBA Data , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[4]  W. Verhoef Earth observation modelling based on layer scattering matrices , 1984 .

[5]  M. Schlerf,et al.  Inversion of a forest reflectance model to estimate structural canopy variables from hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2006 .

[6]  R. Casa,et al.  Retrieval of crop canopy properties: a comparison between model inversion from hyperspectral data and image classification , 2004 .

[7]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Applying different inversion techniques to retrieve stand variables of summer barley with PROSPECT + SAIL , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[8]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Generation of a Species-Specific Look-Up Table for Fuel Moisture Content Assessment , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[10]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Evaluation of Sentinel-2 Spectral Sampling for Radiative Transfer Model Based LAI Estimation of Wheat, Sugar Beet, and Maize , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Yang Fei,et al.  Assessment of MODIS LAI product accuracy based on the PROSAIL model, TM and field measurements. , 2010 .

[12]  J. Hill,et al.  Use of coupled canopy structure dynamic and radiative transfer models to estimate biophysical canopy characteristics , 2005 .

[13]  G. D’Urso,et al.  Experimental assessment of the Sentinel-2 band setting for RTM-based LAI retrieval of sugar beet and maize , 2009 .

[14]  F. Baret,et al.  Improving canopy variables estimation from remote sensing data by exploiting ancillary information. Case study on sugar beet canopies , 2002 .

[15]  W. J. Timmermans,et al.  Physically based retrieval of crop characteristics for improved water use estimates , 2009 .

[16]  R. Myneni,et al.  Investigation of a model inversion technique to estimate canopy biophysical variables from spectral and directional reflectance data , 2000 .

[17]  Roshanak Darvishzadeh,et al.  Inversion of a Radiative Transfer Model for Estimation of Rice Canopy Chlorophyll Content Using a Lookup-Table Approach , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Brigitte Leblon,et al.  Non-destructive estimation of potato leaf chlorophyll from canopy hyperspectral reflectance using the inverted PROSAIL model , 2007, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation.

[19]  W. Verhoef Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modeling: The Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves (SAIL) model , 1984 .

[20]  Wolfram Mauser,et al.  Optimal Exploitation of the Sentinel-2 Spectral Capabilities for Crop Leaf Area Index Mapping , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Xingfa Gu,et al.  Evaluation of methods for soil surface moisture estimation from reflectance data , 2003 .

[22]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[23]  Aleixandre Verger,et al.  Optimal modalities for radiative transfer-neural network estimation of canopy biophysical characteristics: Evaluation over an agricultural area with CHRIS/PROBA observations , 2011 .

[24]  M. Vohland,et al.  Estimating structural and biochemical parameters for grassland from spectroradiometer data by radiative transfer modelling (PROSPECT+SAIL) , 2008 .

[25]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Inversion of a radiative transfer model for estimating vegetation LAI and chlorophyll in a heterogeneous grassland , 2008 .