Effect of housing system during pregnancy on reproductive parameters of sows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of sows in individual stalls (Stall) or group-housed into groups on days 3 to 5 (Pen5) or 38 to 42 (Pen42) after breeding. The reproductive data was collected from the operating system of the farm establishing the average of the weekly performances of the sows that gave birth, for four years, except for the Pen5 system, which was evaluated for three years. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS®, using MIXED (for quantitative traits), NPAR1WAY (for categorical traits) and LOGISTIC (binomial traits) procedures, using sows as a repeated measure. Sows in Stall system had piglets with higher birth weight them sows in the group-housed system (P<0.05), however the piglets born alive, total piglets weaned, average litter weight, and duration of farrowing were lower in this system than in the group-housed (P<0.0001). There was no difference between Pen5 and Stall systems for gestation period and mummified piglets. The Pen42 system had a higher percentage of mummified piglets and a shorter gestation period, when compared Pen5 and Stall systems (P<0.0001), and similar results to the Pen5 system for duration of farrowing, piglets born alive, stillbirths, total piglets weaned, average litter weight and birth weight (P<0.0001).

[1]  D. Ram.  Litter Performance of Large White Yorkshire Sows Raised in Different Farrowing House Systems in Tropical Climate , 2019, Journal of Animal Research.

[2]  M. Rovani,et al.  Prepartum progestagen supplementation in swine: a strategy to facilitate piglet care and prevent early parturition , 2017 .

[3]  J. Salak-Johnson.  Social status and housing factors affect reproductive performance of pregnant sows in groups , 2017, Molecular reproduction and development.

[4]  Y. Koketsu,et al.  Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds , 2017, Porcine health management.

[5]  R. Morrison,et al.  Effects of stage of gestation at mixing on aggression, injuries and stress in sows , 2015 .

[6]  A. Valros,et al.  Effects of prepartum housing environment on abnormal behaviour, the farrowing process, and interactions with circulating oxytocin in sows , 2015 .

[7]  M. Hernandez-Jover,et al.  Investigating risk factors and possible infectious aetiologies of mummified fetuses on a large piggery in Australia. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[8]  R. Lyons,et al.  Physical Activity and Excess Weight in Pregnancy Have Independent and Unique Effects on Delivery and Perinatal Outcomes , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  L. Greiner,et al.  Effect of day of mixing gestating sows on measures of reproductive performance and animal welfare. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[10]  D. Broom,et al.  Piglet mortality: the impact of induction of farrowing using prostaglandins and oxytocin. , 2013, Animal reproduction science.

[11]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Intra-uterine growth retardation affects birthweight and postnatal development in pigs, impairing muscle accretion, duodenal mucosa morphology and carcass traits. , 2013, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[12]  I. Andretta,et al.  Meta-analysis on the relationship among feeding characteristics, salivary and plasmatic cortisol levels, and performance of pregnant sows housed in different systems , 2012 .

[13]  D. Driemeier,et al.  Metodologia aplicada na avaliação de fetos suínos abortados e natimortos , 2010 .

[14]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  Uterine activity and fetal electronic monitoring in parturient sows treated with vetrabutin chlorhydrate. , 2010, Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics.

[15]  W. Van Wettere,et al.  Mixing gilts in early pregnancy does not affect embryo survival. , 2008, Animal reproduction science.

[16]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  Can uterotonics reduce fetal and newborn piglet mortality by perinatal asphyxia and improve functional vitality , 2006 .

[17]  K. Kaeoket.  The effect of dose and route of administration of R-cloprostenol on the parturient response of sows. , 2006, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[18]  Leena Anil,et al.  Effect of group size and structure on the welfare and performance of pregnant sows in pens with electronic sow feeders. , 2006, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[19]  J J McGlone,et al.  Evaluation of drop versus trickle-feeding systems for crated or group-penned gestating sows. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[20]  M. Bernardi,et al.  Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummification in four Brazilian swine herds. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[21]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  Uterine and fetal asphyxia monitoring in parturient sows treated with oxytocin. , 2005, Animal reproduction science.

[22]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  Effect of oxytocin treatment in sows on umbilical cord morphology, meconium staining, and neonatal mortality of piglets. , 2002, American journal of veterinary research.

[23]  L. Boyle,et al.  Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates , 2002 .