Lifetime of muscarinic receptor–G-protein complexes determines coupling efficiency and G-protein subtype selectivity

Significance The family of G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest receptor family, and each member detects specific ligands, which in turn, activate selected members of one or more G-protein families. We developed a broadly applicable assay to study the specificity of GPCR–G-protein interaction in a subtype selective manner. We were able to quantitatively measure both association and dissociation rates of G proteins from agonist-activated GPCRs. We found that the stability of the receptor–G-protein complex is an inherent property of both interaction partners independent on the agonist used. Furthermore, its lifetime correlated closely with the ability of the receptor to activate the corresponding G-protein subtype. G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are essential for the detection of extracellular stimuli by cells and transfer the encoded information via the activation of functionally distinct subsets of heterotrimeric G proteins into intracellular signals. Despite enormous achievements toward understanding GPCR structures, major aspects of the GPCR–G-protein selectivity mechanism remain unresolved. As this can be attributed to the lack of suitable and broadly applicable assays, we set out to develop a quantitative FRET-based assay to study kinetics and affinities of G protein binding to activated GPCRs in membranes of permeabilized cells in the absence of nucleotides. We measured the association and dissociation kinetics of agonist-induced binding of Gi/o, Gq/11, Gs, and G12/13 proteins to muscarinic M1, M2, and M3 receptors in the absence of nucleotides between fluorescently labeled G proteins and receptors expressed in mammalian cells. Our results show a strong quantitative correlation between not the on-rates of G-protein–M3–R interactions but rather the affinities of Gq and Go proteins to M3–Rs, their GPCR–G-protein lifetime and their coupling efficiencies determined in intact cells, suggesting that the G-protein subtype-specific affinity to the activated receptor in the absence of nucleotides is, in fact, a major determinant of the coupling efficiency. Our broadly applicable FRET-based assay represents a fast and reliable method to quantify the intrinsic affinity and relative coupling selectivity of GPCRs toward all G-protein subtypes.

[1]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  Selectivity determinants of GPCR–G-protein binding , 2017, Nature.

[2]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Allosteric coupling from G protein to the agonist binding pocket in GPCRs , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Crystal structures of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors , 2016, Nature.

[4]  J. Benovic,et al.  Interdicting Gq Activation in Airway Disease by Receptor-Dependent and Receptor-Independent Mechanisms , 2016, Molecular Pharmacology.

[5]  A. J. Venkatakrishnan,et al.  Universal allosteric mechanism for Gα activation by GPCRs , 2015, Nature.

[6]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of heterotrimeric G-protein complex diversity and their interactions with GPCRs in solution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  M. Bünemann,et al.  Influence of Gαq on the Dynamics of M3-Acetylcholine Receptor–G-Protein–Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Interaction , 2015, Molecular Pharmacology.

[8]  A. Karginov,et al.  Gα13/PDZ-RhoGEF/RhoA Signaling Is Essential for Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor–Mediated Colon Cancer Cell Migration , 2014, Molecular Pharmacology.

[9]  K. Gourgoulianis,et al.  Long-term exposure to muscarinic agonists decreases expression of contractile proteins and responsiveness of rabbit tracheal smooth muscle cells , 2014, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[10]  J. Wess,et al.  Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , 2013, Nature.

[11]  M. Bünemann,et al.  Dynamics of Gαi1 interaction with type 5 adenylate cyclase reveal the molecular basis for high sensitivity of Gi-mediated inhibition of cAMP production. , 2013, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  U. Zabel,et al.  Comparison of the Activation Kinetics of the M3 Acetylcholine Receptor and a Constitutively Active Mutant Receptor in Living Cells , 2012, Molecular Pharmacology.

[13]  A. Kruse,et al.  Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist , 2011, Nature.

[14]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Structure-function studies of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 2012, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[15]  Zhanchao Li,et al.  Classification of G proteins and prediction of GPCRs-G proteins coupling specificity using continuous wavelet transform and information theory , 2011, Amino Acids.

[16]  Zhenghong Qin,et al.  Activation of M3 muscarinic receptors inhibits T-type Ca(2+) channel currents via pertussis toxin-sensitive novel protein kinase C pathway in small dorsal root ganglion neurons. , 2011, Cellular signalling.

[17]  J. Sýkora,et al.  The effect of detergents on trimeric G-protein activity in isolated plasma membranes from rat brain cortex: correlation with studies of DPH and Laurdan fluorescence. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  M. Bünemann,et al.  Coupling mode of receptors and G proteins , 2009, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[19]  T. Kenakin Receptor Theory , 2008, Current protocols in pharmacology.

[20]  H. Hamm,et al.  Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  M. Lohse,et al.  G Protein Activation without Subunit Dissociation Depends on a Gαi-specific Region* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Siderovski,et al.  The GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits , 2005, International journal of biological sciences.

[23]  D. Roberts,et al.  G protein activation by G protein coupled receptors: ternary complex formation or catalyzed reaction? , 2004, Biochemical pharmacology.

[24]  M. Lohse,et al.  Gi protein activation in intact cells involves subunit rearrangement rather than dissociation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Emmanuel Hermans,et al.  Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2003, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[26]  M. Lohse,et al.  Measurement of the millisecond activation switch of G protein–coupled receptors in living cells , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Stephen K.-F. Wong,et al.  G Protein Selectivity Is Regulated by Multiple Intracellular Regions of GPCRs , 2003, Neurosignals.

[28]  T. Kenakin,et al.  G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing , 2002, Pharmacological Reviews.

[29]  P. Albert,et al.  G protein specificity: traffic direction required. , 2002, Cellular signalling.

[30]  T. Hughes,et al.  Visualization of a Functional Gαq-Green Fluorescent Protein Fusion in Living Cells , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  T. Hughes,et al.  Visualization of a functional Galpha q-green fluorescent protein fusion in living cells. Association with the plasma membrane is disrupted by mutational activation and by elimination of palmitoylation sites, but not be activation mediated by receptors or AlF4-. , 2001, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  W. White,et al.  &bgr;2-Adrenergic and Several Other G Protein–Coupled Receptors in Human Atrial Membranes Activate Both Gs and Gi , 2000 .

[33]  W. White,et al.  Beta(2)-adrenergic and several other G protein-coupled receptors in human atrial membranes activate both G(s) and G(i). , 2000, Circulation research.

[34]  E M Ross,et al.  Rapid GTP binding and hydrolysis by G(q) promoted by receptor and GTPase-activating proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  J. Wess,et al.  Molecular basis of receptor/G-protein-coupling selectivity. , 1998, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[36]  J. Wess,et al.  Structure-function analysis of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors , 1998, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[37]  S. Rees,et al.  Interactions of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor with multiple Gi-family G-proteins: studies with pertussis toxin-resistant G-protein mutants. , 1997, The Biochemical journal.

[38]  T. Gudermann,et al.  Involvement of Gs and Gi Proteins in Dual Coupling of the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor to Adenylyl Cyclase and Phospholipase C* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  S R Nahorski,et al.  Muscarinic m1 receptor-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in Chinese hamster ovary cells is mediated by Gs alpha and is not a consequence of phosphoinositidase C activation. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[40]  G. Schultz,et al.  A heterotrimeric G protein complex couples the muscarinic m1 receptor to phospholipase C-beta. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  T. Gudermann,et al.  Diversity and selectivity of receptor-G protein interaction. , 1996, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[42]  A. Tobin,et al.  Differential coupling of m1, m2 and m3 muscarinic receptor subtypes to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate accumulation in Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1995, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[43]  E. Lakatta,et al.  Functional coupling of the beta 2-adrenoceptor to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein in cardiac myocytes. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[44]  G. Schultz,et al.  The human thyrotropin receptor activates G-proteins Gs and Gq/11. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  A. Gilman,et al.  Expression of G-protein alpha subunits in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[46]  J. Wess Molecular basis of muscarinic receptor function , 1993 .

[47]  R. Carroll,et al.  Transfected m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors couple to G alpha i2 and G alpha i3 in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Activation and desensitization of the phospholipase C signaling pathway. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[48]  J. Wess Molecular basis of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor function. , 1993, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[49]  S. Liggett,et al.  Simultaneous coupling of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors to two G-proteins with opposing effects. Subtype-selective coupling of alpha 2C10, alpha 2C4, and alpha 2C2 adrenergic receptors to Gi and Gs. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  E. Ross,et al.  Reconstitution of agonist-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis using purified m1 muscarinic receptor, Gq/11, and phospholipase C-beta 1. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[51]  E. Ross,et al.  Selectivity of the beta-adrenergic receptor among Gs, Gi's, and Go: assay using recombinant alpha subunits in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[52]  C. Heilman,et al.  Functional responses of cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells. , 1991, Molecular pharmacology.

[53]  Melvin I. Simon,et al.  Diversity of G proteins in signal transduction , 1991, Science.

[54]  P C Sternweis,et al.  Regulation of polyphosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C activity by purified Gq. , 1991, Science.

[55]  J. Thorner,et al.  Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. , 1991, Annual review of biochemistry.

[56]  R. Miller,et al.  Purification and characterization of Go alpha and three types of Gi alpha after expression in Escherichia coli. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  G. Schultz,et al.  Role of G proteins in calcium channel modulation. , 1990, Annual review of physiology.

[58]  A. Ashkenazi,et al.  Structural and functional diversity of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. , 1989, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[59]  A. Gilman,et al.  Effects of Mg2+ and the beta gamma-subunit complex on the interactions of guanine nucleotides with G proteins. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[60]  M. Caron,et al.  Specificity of the functional interactions of the beta-adrenergic receptor and rhodopsin with guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[61]  M. Caron,et al.  The mammalian beta 2-adrenergic receptor: reconstitution of functional interactions between pure receptor and pure stimulatory nucleotide binding protein of the adenylate cyclase system. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[62]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.