A CFD study on the effect of the characteristic dimension of catalytic wall microreactors

A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study of the steam methane reforming (SMR) in microreactors is presented. Emphasis has been made on investigating the effects of the characteristic dimension (d: 0.35, 0.70, 1.40, and 2.80 mm) on the performance of two microreactor geometries: square microchannels and microslits. Results have shown that for both geometries the SMR conversion decreases markedly as d increases. Conversely, the microchannels provide a methane conversion slightly higher than that of the microslits. The different performance of the microreactors is only partially due to the different surface-to-volume ratio. Pronounced transverse temperature and concentration gradients develop as the characteristic dimension increases especially for microslits in the first half of the reactor. Therefore, external transport limitations can affect the performance of microreactors for SMR, although the characteristic dimensions are of the order of very few millimeters. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2012

[1]  P. M. Diéguez,et al.  Methane steam reforming in a microchannel reactor for GTL intensification: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study , 2009 .

[2]  G. Froment,et al.  REACTOR MODELING AND SIMULATIONS IN SYNTHESIS GAS PRODUCTION , 1995 .

[3]  Asterios Gavriilidis,et al.  Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor , 2003 .

[4]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  The roles of catalysis and reaction engineering in overcoming the energy and the environment crisis , 2010 .

[5]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  Intensification of steam reforming of natural gas: Choosing combustible fuel and reforming catalyst , 2010 .

[6]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Efficient reactor concepts for coupling of endothermic and exothermic reactions , 2002 .

[7]  Yong Wang,et al.  Heterogeneous Reactor Model for Steam Reforming of Methane in a Microchannel Reactor with Microstructured Catalysts , 2005 .

[8]  Jhuma Sadhukhan,et al.  Process intensification aspects for steam methane reforming: An overview , 2009 .

[9]  P. M. Diéguez,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics study of heat transfer in a microchannel reactor for low-temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2010 .

[10]  Yong Wang,et al.  Review of developments in portable hydrogen production using microreactor technology. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[11]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  Scale-out of Microreactor Stacks for Portable and Distributed Processing: Coupling of Exothermic and Endothermic Processes for Syngas Production , 2010 .

[12]  Modelling of a Catalytic Micro-Reactor Coupling Endothermic Methane Reforming and Combustion , 2010 .

[13]  Thomas Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Manufacture of hydrogen , 2005 .

[14]  Sung Hyun Kim,et al.  Novel micro fuel processor for PEMFCs with heat generation by catalytic combustion , 2005 .

[15]  P. M. Diéguez,et al.  Integration of methanol steam reforming and combustion in a microchannel reactor for H2 production: A CFD simulation study , 2009 .

[16]  Yong Wang,et al.  From seconds to milliseconds to microseconds through tailored microchannel reactor design of a steam methane reformer , 2007 .

[17]  Steve Perry,et al.  Microchannel Process Technology for Compact Methane Steam Reforming , 2004 .

[18]  Marcel Liauw,et al.  Mass transfer limitations in microchannel reactors , 2005 .

[19]  Albert Renken,et al.  Microstructured reactors for catalytic reactions , 2005 .

[20]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Catalytic Steam Reforming , 1984 .

[21]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  Millisecond methane steam reforming via process and catalyst intensification , 2008 .

[22]  P. M. Diéguez,et al.  Selective CO removal over Au/CeFe and CeCu catalysts in microreactors studied through kinetic analysis and CFD simulations , 2011 .

[23]  V. Subramani,et al.  Catalytic Steam Reforming Technology for the Production of Hydrogen and Syngas , 2009 .

[24]  Gunther Kolb,et al.  Micro-structured reactors for gas phase reactions , 2004 .

[25]  S. Kolaczkowski,et al.  Development of combustion catalysts for monolith reactors: a consideration of transport limitations , 1996 .

[26]  Mario Montes,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in microchannels , 2011 .

[27]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Enhancing stability in parallel plate microreactor stacks for syngas production , 2011 .

[28]  Eduardo López,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulation of ethanol steam reforming in catalytic wall microchannels , 2011 .

[29]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  High vs. low temperature reforming for hydrogen production via microtechnology , 2009 .

[30]  L. Kiwi-Minsker,et al.  Microstructured catalytic reactors , 2010 .

[31]  Sylvia A. Cruz,et al.  Design and testing of a microchannel reactor for the PROX reaction , 2011 .

[32]  G. Arzamendi,et al.  Preferential oxidation of CO (CO-PROX) over CuOx/CeO2 coated microchannel reactor , 2012 .

[33]  X. Verykios,et al.  Chemical Reaction Engineering and Catalysis Issues in Distributed Power Generation Systems , 2011 .

[34]  Paolo Ciambelli,et al.  Micro-Scale Catalytic Reactor for Syngas Production , 2010 .

[35]  Chunshan Song.  Introduction to Hydrogen and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies , 2009 .

[36]  Laura J. Silva,et al.  Microchannel reactor architecture enables greener processes , 2010 .

[37]  Brian S. Haynes,et al.  Scaleable, microstructured plant for steam reforming of methane , 2008 .

[38]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Examination of External Mass Transport in a Microchannel Reactor by Pressure Variation , 2004 .