Trends and determinants of cycling in the Washington, DC region.

16. Abstract This report analyzes cycling trends, policies, and commuting in the Washington, DC area. The analysis is divided into two parts. Part 1 focuses on cycling trends and policies in Washington (DC), Alexandria (VA), Arlington County (VA), Fairfax County (VA), Montgomery County (MD), and Prince George's County (MD) during the last two decades. The goal is to gain a better understanding of variability and determinants of cycling within one metropolitan area. Data on bicycling trends and policies originate from official published documents, unpublished reports, site visits, and in-person, email, or phone interviews with transport planners and experts from municipal governments, regional planning agencies, and bicycling advocacy organizations. Part 2 of the report presents a multiple regression analysis of determinants of bike commuting based on data of 5,091 workers from the Washington, DC region. A series of logit, probit, and relogit (Rare Events Logistic) regressions focus on the role of bike parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work as determinants of the decision to cycle to work, while controlling for socioeconomic factors, population density, trip distance, bikeway supply, and season of the year. The report finds that cycling levels and cyclist safety have been increasing in the Washington region. However, cycling appears to be spatially concentrated in neighborhoods of the urban core jurisdictions. Compared to national averages for urbanized areas a larger share of bicycle trips in Washington, DC is commute or work related (41% vs. 17%). Area cyclists are predominantly male, between 25 and 40 years old, white, and from higher income groups. Bicycle planning in the region has its roots in the 1970s, experienced a hiatus in the 1980s, but has witnessed a 'renaissance' since the (late) 1990s. Initially bicycle policies focused on the provision of off-street paths—often shared with pedestrians. Since the late 1990s, jurisdictions have greatly expanded their on-street bicycle lanes and implemented other innovative programs. The regression analysis appears to support the expansion of the bike network, since bikeway supply is a significant predictor of bike commuting. Moreover, bike parking and cyclist showers at work are associated with more bike commuting. Free car parking at work is associated with less bike commuting; and transit commuter benefits were not a significant predictor of bike commuting. 17. This report analyzes cycling trends, policies, and commuting in the Washington, DC area— including the urban core and inner suburban jurisdictions of Washington, DC; Alexandria City, Arlington County, …

[1]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Analysis of Stated Preferences for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces , 1996 .

[2]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? , 2003 .

[3]  M. Wardman,et al.  Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work , 2007 .

[4]  M. Baltes Factors influencing nondiscretionary work trips by bicycle determined from 1990 U.S. census metropolitan statistical area data , 1996 .

[5]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Contributions of Daily Walking and Cycling to Physical Activity , 2022 .

[6]  J. Snell program information , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Walking and Cycling International Literature Review : Final Report , 2009 .

[8]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[9]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Risk of injury for bicycling on cycle tracks versus in the street , 2011, Injury Prevention.

[10]  P. Jacobsen Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[11]  A. Bauman,et al.  Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[12]  Karel Martens,et al.  Promoting Bike-and-Ride: The Dutch Experience , 2007 .

[13]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[14]  Scienze Politiche American Community Survey , 2011 .

[15]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[16]  D. Banister Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century , 2005 .

[17]  John E Abraham,et al.  Influences on bicycle use , 2007 .

[18]  Kees Maat,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature , 2010 .

[19]  Gary King,et al.  ReLogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression , 2003 .

[20]  Gary King,et al.  Explaining Rare Events in International Relations , 2001, International Organization.

[21]  Kristen Steele Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2010 Benchmarking Report , 2010 .

[22]  Peter H. Smith,et al.  Liberal and Illiberal Democracy in Latin America , 2008, Latin American Politics and Society.

[23]  Royce Hanson,et al.  Active living and biking: tracing the evolution of a biking system in Arlington, Virginia. , 2008, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[24]  G. Rose,et al.  Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[25]  D. Shoup Instead of Free Parking , 1999 .

[26]  D. Shoup The High Cost of Free Parking , 1997 .

[27]  C. Bhat,et al.  Frequency of Bicycle Commuting: Internet-Based Survey Analysis , 2004 .

[28]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips , 1995 .

[29]  M. Wardman,et al.  Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data , 2007 .

[30]  Robert Cervero,et al.  THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND TRAVEL: EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[31]  O. W. Caldwell MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. , 1944, Science.

[32]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Acces to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use , 2009 .

[33]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[34]  J. Pucher,et al.  Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes , 2012 .

[35]  P. DeMaio Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future , 2009 .

[36]  John Pucher,et al.  Integrating Bicycling and Public Transport in North America , 2009 .

[37]  William E. Moritz,et al.  Survey of North American Bicycle Commuters: Design and Aggregate Results , 1997 .

[38]  R. Porter The United States Census , 1890, Nature.

[39]  T. Schwanen Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross‐European perspective , 2002 .

[40]  R. Ewing,et al.  Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change , 2008 .

[41]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them , 2003 .

[42]  Lisa L. Martin The President and International Commitments: Treaties as Signaling Devices , 2005 .

[43]  J Wagner,et al.  Are nascent entrepreneurs ‘Jacks-of-all-trades’? A test of Lazear's theory of entrepreneurship with German data , 2003 .

[44]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Who are Bicyclists? Why and how much are they Bicycling? , 2009 .

[45]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[46]  Jeromey B. Temple Correlates of housing affordability stress among older Australians , 2008, Australasian journal on ageing.