Applying Ecologically Based Invasive-Plant Management

Abstract The need for a unified mechanistic ecological framework that improves our ability to make decisions, predicts vegetation change, guides the implementation of restoration, and fosters learning is substantial and unmet. It is becoming increasingly clear that integrating various types of ecological models into an overall framework has great promise for assisting decision making in invasive-plant management and restoration. Overcoming barriers to adoption of ecologically based invasive-plant management will require developing principles and integrating them into a useful format so land managers can easily understand the linkages among ecological processes, vegetation dynamics, management practices, and assessment. We have amended a generally accepted and well-tested successional management framework into a comprehensive decision tool for ecologically based invasive-plant management (EBIPM) by 1) using the Rangeland Health Assessment to identify ecological processes in need of repair, 2) amending our framework to include principles for repairing ecological processes that direct vegetation dynamics, and 3) incorporating adaptive management procedures to foster the acquisition of new information during management. This decision tool provides a step-by-step planning process that integrates assessment and adaptive management with process-based principles to provide management guidance. In our case-study example, EBIPM increased the chance of restoration success by 66% over traditionally applied integrated weed management in an invasive-plant–dominated ephemeral wetland ecosystem. We believe that this framework provides the basis for EBIPM and will enhance our ability to design and implement sustainable invasive-plant management and restoration programs.

[1]  R. Drenovsky,et al.  Variation in resource acquisition and utilization traits between native and invasive perennial forbs. , 2008, American journal of botany.

[2]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Nature and Structure of the Climax , 1936 .

[3]  R. Sheley,et al.  Augmentative Restoration: Repairing Damaged Ecological Processes During Restoration of Heterogeneous Environments , 2009, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[4]  R. Sheley,et al.  ENHANCING INTERMEDIATE WHEATGRASS ESTABLISHMENT IN SPOTTED KNAPWEED INFESTED RANGELAND , 1999 .

[5]  David Tilman,et al.  Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[6]  R. Sheley,et al.  Influence of density on intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed interference. , 1997 .

[7]  Monica L. Pokorny,et al.  Plant Functional Group Diversity as a Mechanism for Invasion Resistance , 2005 .

[8]  K. Gross Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (Mullein) of an old-field in Michigan : experiments on the effects of vegetation , 1980 .

[9]  J. James,et al.  Principles for Ecologically Based Invasive Plant Management , 2010, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[10]  Kimberly J. Reever Morghan,et al.  Successful Adaptive Management—The Integration of Research and Management , 2006 .

[11]  R. Sheley,et al.  Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland , 2006 .

[12]  W. Larcher Physiological Plant Ecology , 1977 .

[13]  E. J. Dyksterhuis Condition and Management of Range Land Based on Quantitative Ecology. , 1949 .

[14]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1985 .

[15]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[16]  Cattle, Deer, and Elk Grazing of the Invasive Plant Sulfur Cinquefoil , 2008 .

[17]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability , 2004, Oecologia.

[18]  Patrick L. Shaver,et al.  Interpreting indicators of rangeland health , 2005 .

[19]  S. Hardegree,et al.  Prediction of Cheatgrass Field Germination Potential Using Wet Thermal Accumulation , 2007 .

[20]  J. Fargione,et al.  Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects , 2005 .

[21]  R. Sheley,et al.  Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland , 2003, Weed Science.

[22]  J. Luken,et al.  Directing Ecological Succession , 1990 .

[23]  T. Monaco,et al.  Mediterranean annual grasses in western North America: kids in a candy store , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[24]  R. Sheley,et al.  Using Rangeland Health Assessment to Inform Successional Management , 2011, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[25]  S. Pickett,et al.  Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession , 1987, The Botanical Review.

[26]  J. Borkowski,et al.  Using Ecological Theory to Guide the Implementation of Augmentative Restoration1 , 2004 .

[27]  T. L. Dickson,et al.  The relative importance of the species pool, productivity and disturbance in regulating grassland plant species richness: a field experiment , 2008 .

[28]  S. Whisenant,et al.  Repairing Damaged Wildlands , 2000 .

[29]  P. Greig-Smith,et al.  Plant Communities: Textbook of Plant Synecology. , 1971 .

[30]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Chapter 2 – Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests , 1985 .

[31]  T. Mclendon,et al.  Effects of nitrogen limitation on species replacement dynamics during early secondary succession on a semiarid sagebrush site , 1992, Oecologia.

[32]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[33]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Realistic Variation in Species Composition Affects Grassland Production, Resource Use and Invasion Resistance , 2006, Plant Ecology.

[34]  A. Bischoff Dispersal and establishment of floodplain grassland species as limiting factors in restoration , 2002 .

[35]  Nicolas Mouquet,et al.  A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[36]  S. Pickett,et al.  Chapter 12 – Responses of Forest Herbs to Canopy Gaps , 1985 .

[37]  Frank E. Egler,et al.  Vegetation science concepts I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development with 2 figs. , 1954, Vegetatio.

[38]  G. Matlack,et al.  The habitat and conduit functions of roads in the spread of three invasive plant species , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[39]  M. Westoby,et al.  Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. , 1989 .

[40]  W. Harpole Resource-Ratio Theory and the Control of Invasive Plants , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[41]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? , 1997 .

[42]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Patrick L. Shaver,et al.  Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment , 2002 .

[44]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[45]  K. Gross,et al.  Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere , 1982 .

[46]  Carla M. D'Antonio,et al.  Exotic Plant Species as Problems and Solutions in Ecological Restoration: A Synthesis , 2002 .

[47]  STEVEN A. DEWEY,et al.  Distinct Roles of Surveys, Inventories, and Monitoring in Adaptive Weed Management1 , 2004 .

[48]  W. Laycock Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: a viewpoint. , 1991 .

[49]  J. Fargione,et al.  Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[50]  David S Wilcove,et al.  Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  David Tilman,et al.  Competition Among Grasses Along a Nitrogen Gradient: Initial Conditions and Mechanisms of Competition , 1993 .

[52]  R. Sheley,et al.  Toward ecologically-based invasive plant management on rangeland , 2006, Weed Science.

[53]  B. Maxwell,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Developing Successional Weed Management Strategies on Rangeland , 1996, Weed Technology.

[54]  M. Lönn,et al.  Artificial Dispersal as a Restoration Tool in Meadows: Sowing or Planting? , 2009 .

[55]  B. Bestelmeyer,et al.  Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. , 2003 .

[56]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .