Multirigid registration of MR and CT images of the cervical spine

We present our work on fusion of MR and CT images of the cervical spine. To achieve the required registration accuracy of approximately 1mm, the spine is treated as a collection of rigid vertebrae, and a separate rigid body transformation applied to each (Hawkes). This in turn requires segmentation of the CT datasets into separate vertebral images, which is difficult because the narrow planes separating adjacent vertebrae are parallel to the axial plane of the CT scans. We solve this problem by evolving all the vertebral contours simultaneously using a level set method, and use contour competition to estimate the position of the vertebral edges when a clean separation between adjacent vertebrae is not seen. Contour competition is based in turn on the vertical scan principle: no part of a given vertebra is vertically below any part of an inferior vertebra. Once segmentation is complete, the individual rigid body transforms are then estimated using mutual information maximization, and the CT images of the vertebrae superimposed on the MR scans. The resultant fused images contain the bony detail of CT and the soft tissue discrimination of MR and appear to be diagnostically equivalent, or superior, to CT myelograms. A formal test of these conclusions is planned for the next phase of our work.

[1]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[3]  S. Osher,et al.  A PDE-Based Fast Local Level Set Method 1 , 1998 .

[4]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  Segmentation of carpal bones from CT images using skeletally coupled deformable models , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[12]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  A Review of Nonlinear Diffusion Filtering , 1997, Scale-Space.

[13]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Tensor Controlled Local Structure Enhancement of CT Images for Bone Segmentation , 1998, MICCAI.

[14]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[15]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[16]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Region Competition: Unifying Snakes, Region Growing, and Bayes/MDL for Multiband Image Segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.