A two-level multi-agent architecture for a distance learning environment

In this paper some results achieved in the domain of multi-agent methodology applied to educational systems are presented. We have developed a distance learning environment based on a two-level multi-agent architecture. Two-levels are distinguished since the application is composed by two multi-agent systems (MAS). The higher-level MAS is composed of cognitive agents, which provide the main functions of the system. The lower-level MAS is composed of a large number of reactive agents responsible for diagnosing students' conceptions. The two levels communicate through tutor agents, whose educational decisions are based on emergent results coming from the lower level. Besides the multi-agent approach, our work is founded on the emergent theory and employs a mechanism of voting for capturing group decision. This text presents methodological and theoretical aspects of our platform, the architecture proposed and the first prototype implemented for teaching geometry proof.

[1]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  A Multi-agent Approach to the Design of Peer-help Environments , 1999 .

[2]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  Developing Distributed Intelligent Learning Environment with JADE - Java Agents for Distance Education Framework , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[3]  Denise Grenier Construction et étude du fonctionnement d'un processus d'enseignement sur la symétrie orthogonale en sixième. (Construction and study of the realization of a teaching process about axial symmetry for 11-year-old pupils) , 1988 .

[4]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  SMODEL Server: Student Modelling in Distributed Multi-Agent Tutoring Systems , 2001 .

[5]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[6]  Nicolas Lhuillier,et al.  FOUNDATION FOR INTELLIGENT PHYSICAL AGENTS , 2003 .

[7]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[8]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  An architecture for plug-in tutor agents , 1996 .

[9]  M. Calisti,et al.  FOUNDATION FOR INTELLIGENT PHYSICAL AGENTS , 2000 .

[10]  Tony Curzon Price,et al.  Emergence: From Chaos to Order by John H. Holland , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Simulating Emergence and Downward Causation in Small Groups , 2000, MABS.

[12]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Socially Intelligent Agents to Improve the Effectiveness of Educational Games , 2000 .

[13]  Arthur Baskin,et al.  Learning companion systems , 1989 .

[14]  Alexandre Martins,et al.  One for all and all in one: a learner modelling server in a multi-agent platform , 1999 .

[15]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice , 1995, ICMAS.

[16]  Jean-Louis Dessalles,et al.  Characterizing emergent phenomena (1): a critical review , 1995 .

[17]  Roy A. Maxion,et al.  Toward diagnosis as an emergent behavior in a network ecosystem , 1990 .

[18]  Yves Demazeau,et al.  FROM INTERACTIONS TO COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IN AGENT-BASED SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[19]  Nicolas Balacheff A modelling challenge : untangling learner knowledge , 2000 .

[20]  John H. Miller,et al.  Emergent behavior in classifier systems , 1990 .

[21]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  Multi-Agent-Based Simulation , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.