Repurposing CD19-directed immunotherapies for pediatric t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

In contrast to patients with B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not yet benefited from recent advances in targeted immunotherapy. Repurposing immunotherapies that have been successfully used to target other hematological malignancies could, in case of a shared target antigen, represent a promising opportunity to expand the immunotherapeutic options for AML. Here, we evaluated the expression of CD19 in a large pediatric AML cohort, assessed the ex vivo AML killing efficacy of CD19-directed immunotherapies, and characterized the bone marrow immune microenvironment in pediatric AML, BCP-ALL, and non-leukemic controls. Out of 167 newly diagnosed de novo pediatric AML patients, 18 patients (11%) had CD19+ AML, with 61% carrying the translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22). Among CD19+ samples, we observed a continuum of CD19 expression levels on AML cells. In individuals exhibiting unimodal and high CD19 expression, the antigen was consistently present on nearly all CD34+CD38- and CD34+CD38+ subpopulations. In ex vivo AML-T cell co-cultures, blinatumomab demonstrated substantial AML killing, with an efficacy similar to BCP-ALL. In addition, CAR T cells could effectively eliminate CD19+ AML cells ex vivo. Furthermore, our immunogenomic assessment of the bone marrow immune microenvironment of newly diagnosed pediatric t(8;21) AML revealed that T- and NK cells had a less exhausted and senescent phenotype in comparison to pediatric BCP-ALL. Altogether, our study underscores the promise of CD19-directed immunotherapies for the treatment of pediatric CD19+ AML.

[1]  N. Daver,et al.  Novel immunotherapies in the treatment of AML: is there hope? , 2023, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[2]  R. Ries,et al.  A longitudinal single-cell atlas of treatment response in pediatric AML. , 2023, Cancer cell.

[3]  Shuqiang Li,et al.  Mechanisms of response and resistance to combined decitabine and ipilimumab for advanced myeloid disease. , 2023, Blood.

[4]  T. Yau,et al.  Immune dysfunction signatures predict outcomes and define checkpoint blockade–unresponsive microenvironments in acute myeloid leukemia , 2022, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  K. Metzeler,et al.  An Immune Risk Score Predicts Survival of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Chemotherapy , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  Chunxu Qu,et al.  Tumor intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of response to blinatumomab in adults with B-ALL. , 2020, Blood.

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Improved survival for children and young adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: a Dutch study on incidence, survival and mortality , 2018, Leukemia.

[8]  M. Nykter,et al.  Immunogenomic landscape of hematological malignancies , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  G. Freeman,et al.  Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[10]  T. Graeber,et al.  Metabolic gatekeeper function of B-lymphoid transcription factors , 2016, Nature.

[11]  M. Ebinger,et al.  T-cell responses against CD19+ pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia mediated by bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) are regulated contrarily by PD-L1 and CD80/CD86 on leukemic blasts , 2016, Oncotarget.

[12]  T. Kyo,et al.  Phenotypical characteristics of acute myelocytic leukemia associated with the t(8;21)(q22;q22) chromosomal abnormality: frequent expression of immature B-cell antigen CD19 together with stem cell antigen CD34. , 1992, Blood.