Advances and challenges in flash flood warnings

Advances in meteorological, hydrological and engineering sciences are fast generating a range of new methodologies for forecasting weather and flood events, including ensemble prediction systems (EPS) and new hydrodynamic models. These advances are in addition to those already made in weather radar and quantitative precipitation forecasting which have enhanced flood warning lead time potential; in integrated real-time monitoring and modeling; and in long-term models. Each of these advances presents new challenges within the complex information and data flows which now exist between actors generating forecasts and actors using them (Fig. 1). At the same time, the natural, physical and engineering sciences, which are generating the technical advances noted above, are being challenged by social science. The social science paradigm focuses on human perceptions of risk information and the under-estimated complexities of communicating risk between actors, and stresses that uncertainty must be managed rather than eradicated. It has already contributed much to a broader and deeper understanding of human behaviour in the face of hazard warnings. It promises to contribute further in addressing the risk communication and response issues now raised by the new wave of technical advances.

[1]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Natural Hazard Warning Systems in the Unites States: A Research Assessment , 1975 .

[2]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  Vulnérabilité face aux crues rapides et mobilités des populations en temps de crise , 2004 .

[3]  Robert W. Kates,et al.  Hazard And Choice Perception In Flood Plain Management , 1962 .

[4]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  THE WARNING PROCESS AND EVACUATION BEHAVIOR: THE RESEARCH EVIDENCE , 1990 .

[5]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany , 2005 .

[6]  Rebecca E. Morss,et al.  WAS*IS: Building a community for integrating meteorology and social science , 2007 .

[7]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[8]  J. Handmer,et al.  Improving flood warnings in Europe: a research and policy agenda , 2001 .

[9]  Jutta Thielen,et al.  Ensemble predictions and perceptions of risk, uncertainty, and error in flood forecasting , 2007 .

[10]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  What information belongs in a warning , 1998 .

[11]  T. Drabek Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings , 2011 .

[12]  R. Pielke Asking the right questions : Atmospheric sciences research and societal needs , 1997 .

[13]  Mitch Goldberg,et al.  Research to operations , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[14]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  The Benefits of Flood Warnings: Real But Elusive, and Politically Significant , 2000 .

[15]  Keith Beven,et al.  Developing a Translational Discourse to Communicate Uncertainty in Flood Risk between Science and the Practitioner , 2007, Ambio.

[16]  John Handmer,et al.  The Role of Unofficial Flood Warning Systems , 1998 .