Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: an exploration of voice-onset time.

Voice-onset time (VOT) was measured in plosive-initial syllables uttered by five cochlear implant users prior to and repeatedly at intervals after activation of their speech processors. In "short-term" experiments, the elicitation set was read after the subject's processor has been off for 24 h, then turned on them off again. Four out of five implant users increased voiceless and/or voiced VOTc (VOT corrected for changes in syllable duration) from preimplant baselines to final recordings made 1-3 years later. Measured acoustic correlates of speech "posture" (average SPL, F0, and low-frequency spectral slope) changed concurrently. Results in the short-term study were largely consistent with the long term. Significant multiple regressions relating changes in VOTc to accompanying changes in postural correlates were found in both studies. This outcome is consistent with hypotheses that predict changes in both VOTc and in postural correlates with the restoration of some hearing and that allow for linkages between the two. Some of the reliable VOTc increases obtained over the long term that were not correlated with postural changes may have been caused directly by auditory validation of articulatory/acoustic relations that underlie synergisms for phoneme production.

[1]  J. Perkell,et al.  Relationships between intra-speaker variation in aerodynamic measures of voice production and variation in SPL across repeated recordings. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  R. Port,et al.  Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  V C Tartter,et al.  The speech of a postlingually deafened teenager during the first year of use of a multichannel cochlear implant. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Gary Weismer,et al.  Control of the voicing distinction for intervocalic stops and fricatives: some data and theoretical considerations , 1980 .

[7]  K. Stevens,et al.  Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J S Perkell,et al.  A system for signal processing and data extraction from aerodynamic, acoustic, and electroglottographic signals in the study of voice production. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. S. Waldstein,et al.  Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Jörgen Pind,et al.  Speaking rate, VOT, and quantity: The search for higher‐order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues , 1994 .

[11]  W M Rabinowitz,et al.  Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J S Perkell,et al.  Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Willy Serniclaes,et al.  Production and perception of French stops by moderately deaf subjects , 1984, Speech Commun..

[14]  J Wozniak,et al.  Changes in voice-onset time in speakers with cochlear implants. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Quentin Summerfield,et al.  How a Full Account of Segmental Perception Depends on Prosody and Vice Versa , 1975 .

[16]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  Interarticulator programming in stop production , 1980 .

[17]  K. Stevens Physics of Laryngeal Behavior and Larynx Modes , 1977, Phonetica.

[18]  M F Dorman,et al.  Auditory/phonetic categorization with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Goal-based speech motor control: A theoretical framework and some preliminary data , 1995 .

[20]  M F Dorman,et al.  Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  H Lane,et al.  Speech of cochlear implant patients: a longitudinal study of vowel production. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Perkell,et al.  Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J B Spitzer,et al.  Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R L Diehl,et al.  Conditions on rate normalization in speech perception , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  H. Hirose,et al.  Posterior Cricoarytenoid as a Speech Muscle , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[26]  K I Kirk,et al.  The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters. , 1983, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.