Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system

The early visual system is endowed with adaptive mechanisms that rapidly adjust gain and integration time based on the local luminance (mean intensity) and contrast (standard deviation of intensity relative to the mean). Here we show that these mechanisms are matched to the statistics of the environment. First, we measured the joint distribution of luminance and contrast in patches selected from natural images and found that luminance and contrast were statistically independent of each other. This independence did not hold for artificial images with matched spectral characteristics. Second, we characterized the effects of the adaptive mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), the direct recipient of retinal outputs. We found that luminance gain control had the same effect at all contrasts and that contrast gain control had the same effect at all mean luminances. Thus, the adaptive mechanisms for luminance and contrast operate independently, reflecting the very independence encountered in natural images.

[1]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Lennie.  Parallel visual pathways: A review , 1980, Vision Research.

[4]  S. Laughlin.  A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[5]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  P. Lennie,et al.  The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Retinal light adaptation—evidence for a feedback mechanism , 1984, Nature.

[8]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[9]  Yoshiro Fukada,et al.  Gain control mechanisms in X- and Y-type retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1986, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Shapley.  The importance of contrast for the activity of single neurons, the vep and perception , 1986, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Victor.  The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell centre. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E Kaplan,et al.  Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[15]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[16]  W. A. van de Grind,et al.  Light adaptation and frequency transfer properties of cat horizontal cells , 1991, Vision Research.

[17]  R. Shapley,et al.  Broadband temporal stimuli decrease the integration time of neurons in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  M. J. M. Lankheet,et al.  The dynamics of light adaptation in cat horizontal cell responses , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Ruderman.  The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[21]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  The time course of adaptation in macaque retinal ganglion cells , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[23]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  R. W. Rodieck.  The First Steps in Seeing , 1998 .

[25]  L. Diller,et al.  Spatial properties of the cat X-cell receptive field as a function of mean light level , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes , 2000, Vision Research.

[27]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Adaptation to Temporal Contrast in Primate and Salamander Retina , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Sherman.  Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  R. Masland,et al.  Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Jonathan B Demb,et al.  Multiple Mechanisms for Contrast Adaptation in the Retina , 2002, Neuron.

[32]  M. Meister,et al.  Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry , 2002, Neuron.

[33]  M. Carandini,et al.  Suppression without Inhibition in Visual Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[34]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Dynamics of sensitivity regulation in primate outer retina: the horizontal cell network. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[35]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  X and Y ganglion cells inform the cat's brain about contrast in the retinal image , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  P. Lennie,et al.  Profound Contrast Adaptation Early in the Visual Pathway , 2004, Neuron.

[37]  L. Palmer,et al.  Contrast-dependent spatial summation in the lateral geniculate nucleus and retina of the cat. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[40]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Contrast Adaptation in Subthreshold and Spiking Responses of Mammalian Y-Type Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Carandini,et al.  The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .