EVALUATION OF INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH BETWEEN GEOSYNTHETICS UNDER WET CONDITION

ABSTRACT This paper presents direct shear testing data for interfaces between a nonwoven geotextile or two types of geosynthetic clay liners (GCL) (reinforced and unreinforced) and two types of geomembranes (smooth and textured). In this study, the effect of moisture on interface shear behavior was investigated by performing shear tests in both dry and wet (or hydrated) conditions because the geosynthetic interfaces in a landfill are easily exposed to rain, leachate and groundwater beneath the liners. The degree of strength reduction with increasing displacement and the effect of the normal stress level on friction angles were examined, and the modified hydration method applied for the GCL was also validated. The test results showed that the normal stress level, interface water presence and hydration methods dominated the interface shear strength and behavior. The relationship between the peak secant friction angle and the normal stress demonstrated that the friction angle decreased with increasing normal stress, implying that the shear strength for safe design should be determined by using the maximum value of the normal stress applied in landfills. Finally, comparisons with a few published test results were presented and some design implications for the geosynthetic-installed landfills were discussed.

[1]  Orencio Monje Vilar,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Municipal Solid Waste , 2004 .

[2]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Stability and tension considerations regarding cover soils on geomembrane lined slopes , 1991 .

[3]  H. Girard,et al.  Slope stability of lining systems—experimental modeling of friction at geosynthetic interfaces , 2002 .

[4]  Ma Gabr,et al.  Geotechnical Properties of Municipal Solid Waste , 1995 .

[5]  Hisham T. Eid,et al.  Effect of Shear Displacement Rate on Internal Shear Strength of a Reinforced Geosynthetic Clay Liner , 1999 .

[6]  A. M. Lahlaf,et al.  Dynamic Interface Shear Strength Properties of Geomembranes and Geotextiles , 1992 .

[7]  Yildiz Wasti Geomembrane–geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests , 2001 .

[8]  Patrick J. Fox,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH OF HDPE GEOMEMBRANE/GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER INTERFACES , 2001 .

[9]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  INTERACTION OF FOUNDRY SANDS WITH GEOSYNTHETICS , 2001 .

[10]  Robert B. Gilbert,et al.  Shear Strength of Reinforced Geosynthetic Clay Liner , 1996 .

[11]  Hisham T. Eid,et al.  HDPE Geomembrane/Geotextile Interface Shear Strength , 1996 .

[12]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Kettleman Hills Waste Landfill Slope Failure. II: Stability Analyses , 1990 .

[13]  Patrick J. Fox,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Large Direct Shear Machine for Geosynthetic Clay Liners , 1997 .

[14]  Abdelmalek Bouazza,et al.  Geosynthetic clay liners , 2002 .

[15]  C. J. Sprague,et al.  Interfacial friction study of cap and liner components for landfill design , 1991 .

[16]  Patrick J. Fox,et al.  Internal shear strength of three geosynthetic clay liners , 1998 .

[17]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Problems of friction posed by the use of geomembranes on dam slopes—examples and measurements , 1990 .

[18]  Pascal Villard,et al.  Analysis of geosynthetic lining systems (GLS) undergoing large deformations , 1999 .

[19]  Neil Dixon,et al.  Shear strength properties of geomembrane/geotextile interfaces , 1998 .

[20]  J. Michael Duncan,et al.  Progressive Failure of Lined Waste Impoundments , 2001 .

[21]  Rudolph Bonaparte,et al.  Influence of Water Flow on the Stability of Geosynthetic-Soil Layered Systems on Slopes , 1995 .

[22]  Robert B. Gilbert,et al.  Strain-softening behavior of waste containment system interfaces , 1996 .

[23]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Kettleman Hills Waste Landfill Slope Failure. I: Liner‐System Properties , 1990 .

[24]  Rudolph Bonaparte,et al.  Slope Stability of Geosynthetic Clay Liner Test Plots , 1998 .