The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science

BackgroundFree and open access to primary biodiversity data is essential for informed decision-making to achieve conservation of biodiversity and sustainable development. However, primary biodiversity data are neither easily accessible nor discoverable. Among several impediments, one is a lack of incentives to data publishers for publishing of their data resources. One such mechanism currently lacking is recognition through conventional scholarly publication of enriched metadata, which should ensure rapid discovery of 'fit-for-use' biodiversity data resources.DiscussionWe review the state of the art of data discovery options and the mechanisms in place for incentivizing data publishers efforts towards easy, efficient and enhanced publishing, dissemination, sharing and re-use of biodiversity data. We propose the establishment of the 'biodiversity data paper' as one possible mechanism to offer scholarly recognition for efforts and investment by data publishers in authoring rich metadata and publishing them as citable academic papers. While detailing the benefits to data publishers, we describe the objectives, work flow and outcomes of the pilot project commissioned by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility in collaboration with scholarly publishers and pioneered by Pensoft Publishers through its journals Zookeys, PhytoKeys, MycoKeys, BioRisk, NeoBiota, Nature Conservation and the forthcoming Biodiversity Data Journal. We then debate further enhancements of the data paper beyond the pilot project and attempt to forecast the future uptake of data papers as an incentivization mechanism by the stakeholder communities.ConclusionsWe believe that in addition to recognition for those involved in the data publishing enterprise, data papers will also expedite publishing of fit-for-use biodiversity data resources. However, uptake and establishment of the data paper as a potential mechanism of scholarly recognition requires a high degree of commitment and investment by the cross-sectional stakeholder communities.

[1]  M. Brady.  World Summit on the Information Society , 2006 .

[2]  Walter G. Berendsohn,et al.  Summary of Recommendations of the GBIF Task Group on the Global Strategy and Action Plan for the Digitisation of Natural History Collections , 2010 .

[3]  Mark John Costello.  Motivating Online Publication of Data , 2009 .

[4]  Jan Brase.  Using Digital Library Techniques - Registration of Scientific Primary Data , 2004, ECDL.

[5]  Bladimir Díaz Borges.  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities , 2008 .

[6]  P. Bryan Heidorn,et al.  Shedding Light on the Dark Data in the Long Tail of Science , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[7]  C. Macilwain,et al.  Museum research comes off list of endangered species , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Lyubomir Penev,et al.  Data publication and dissemination of interactive keys under the open access model ZooKeys working example , 2009 .

[9]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Rising Expectations: Access to Biomedical Information , 2008, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[10]  Data's shameful neglect. , 2009, Nature.

[11]  V. Chavan,et al.  Natural history collections: A call for national information infrastructure , 2003 .

[12]  Vincent S. Smith,et al.  Pensoft Data Publishing Policies and Guidelines for Biodiversity Data , 2011 .

[13]  D. Carr.  Wellcome Trust Policy on Data Management and Sharing , 2011 .

[14]  C. C. Lautenbacher,et al.  The global earth observation system of systems (GEOSS) , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technology.

[15]  Allan Bromley.  Policy Statements on Data Management for Global Change Research , 1991 .

[16]  Norman F. Johnson,et al.  Revision of the Malagasy genus Trichoteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastroidea, Platygastridae) , 2011, ZooKeys.

[17]  Peter Corke,et al.  Editorial: Data Papers - Peer Reviewed Publication of High Quality Data Sets , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  James Campbell,et al.  Big Opportunities in Access to "Small Science" Data , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[19]  Elio Rossi,et al.  Policy , 2007, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM.

[20]  Lyubomir Penev,et al.  Publication and dissemination of datasets in taxonomy: ZooKeys working example , 2009 .

[21]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[22]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[23]  Lyubomir Penev,et al.  Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats , 2009 .

[24]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Towards a data publishing framework for primary biodiversity data: challenges and potentials for the biodiversity informatics community , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[25]  Charles E. Griswold,et al.  The symphytognathoid spiders of the Gaoligongshan, Yunnan, China (Araneae: Araneoidea): Systematics and diversity of micro-orbweavers , 2009 .

[26]  Penny Berents,et al.  TOWARDS DEMAND DRIVEN PUBLISHING: APPROCHES TO THE PRIORITISATION OF DIGITISATION OF NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS DATA , 2010 .

[27]  Arturo H. Ariño.  APPROACHES TO ESTIMATING THE UNIVERSE OF NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS DATA , 2010 .

[28]  Jonathan Rees.  Recommendations for independent scholarly publication of data sets , 2010 .