A Phantom Study of the Geometric Accuracy of Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereotactic Localization with the Leksell Stereotactic System

OBJECTIVE To assess the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system. METHODS The phantom was constructed in the shape of a box, 164 mm in each dimension, with three perpendicular arrays of solid acrylic rod, 5 mm in diameter and spaced 30 mm apart within the phantom. In this study, images from two different MRI scanners and a computed tomographic scanner were obtained using the same Leksell (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) head frame placement. The coordinates of the rod images in the three principal planes were measured by using a tool provided with Leksell GammaPlan software (Elekta Instruments, Norcross, GA) and were compared with the physical phantom measurements. RESULTS The greatest distortion was found around the periphery, and the least distortion (<1.5 mm) was present in the middle and most other areas of the phantom. In the phantom study using computed tomography, the mean values of the maximum errors for the x, y, and z axes were 1.0 mm (range, 0.2–1.3 mm), 0.4 mm (range, 0.1–0.8 mm), and 3.8 mm (range, 1.9–5.1 mm), respectively. The mean values of the maximum errors when using the Philips MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Shelton, CT) were 0.9 mm (range, 0.4–1.7 mm), 0.2 mm (range, 0.0–0.7 mm), and 1.9 mm (range, 1.3–2.3 mm), respectively. Using the Siemens MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, New York, NY), these values were 0.4 mm (range, 0.0–0.7 mm), 0.6 mm (range, 0.0–1.0 mm), and 1.6 mm (range, 0.8–2.0 mm), respectively. The geometric accuracy of the MRI scans when using the Siemens scanner was greatly improved after the implementation of a new software patch provided by the manufacturer. The accuracy also varied with the direction of phase encoding. CONCLUSION The accuracy of target localization for most intracranial lesions during stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved within the size of a voxel, especially by using the Siemens MRI scanner at current specifications and with a new software patch. However, caution is warranted when imaging peripheral lesions, where the distortion is greatest.

[1]  B. Condon,et al.  Accuracy of stereotaxic localisation using MRI and CT. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  V Sturm,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: a prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  T M Peters,et al.  Stereotactic surgical planning with magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography. , 1987, Applied neurophysiology.

[4]  J R Adler,et al.  A new fixation device for the Leksell stereotaxic system. Technical note. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain using the first United States 201 cobalt-60 source gamma knife. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[6]  R A Bakay,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia.

[7]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M Kessler,et al.  Image correlation of MRI and CT in treatment planning for radiosurgery of intracranial vascular malformations. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The accuracies of four stereotactic frame systems: an independent assessment. , 1991, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[10]  E Kanal,et al.  A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for stereotactic coordinate determination. , 1992, Neurosurgery.

[11]  G Luxton,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: principles and comparison of treatment methods. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[12]  H. Kooy,et al.  Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  K. Stelzer,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: a review and comparison of methods. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Glover,et al.  Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotactic surgery. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[15]  Quality assessment of magnetic resonance stereotactic localization for Gamma Knife radiosurgery. , 1995, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Goodman,et al.  Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  M van Herk,et al.  Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a multiinstitutional study using the gamma unit. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  L Walton,et al.  A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[20]  L Walton,et al.  Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[21]  F R Korosec,et al.  Development of a unique phantom to assess the geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for stereotactic localization. , 1999, Neurosurgery.