Are Online Gamblers More At Risk Than Offline Gamblers?

OBJECTIVES To characterize and compare sociodemographic profiles, game-play patterns, and level of addictive behaviors among adults who gamble online and those who do not, and to examine if, at the population level, online gambling is associated with more risky behaviors than offline gambling. METHODS Respondents were 8,456 offline gamblers and 111 online gamblers who participated in a population-based survey conducted in the province of Québec, in 2009. The study sample is representative of adult general population. RESULTS There is an unequal distribution of online gambling in the population. A disproportionate number of men, young people, and students say they participate in online gambling. Poker players are overrepresented among online gamblers and gambling behaviors tend to be more excessive on the Internet. Compared with offline gamblers, online gamblers report more co-occurring risky behaviors, namely alcohol and cannabis use. CONCLUSION Those who gamble online appear to be more at risk for gambling-related problems, but the present findings alone cannot be used as evidence for that conclusion. Future research designs could combine longitudinal data collection and multilevel analyses to provide more insight into the causal mechanisms associated with online gambling.

[1]  Bob Erens,et al.  Sociodemographic Correlates of Internet Gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Social Facilitation in Online and Offline Gambling: A Pilot Study , 2011, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[3]  M. Abbott,et al.  Recruiting Gamblers from the General Population for Research Purposes: Outcomes from Two Contrasting Approaches , 2009, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[4]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Internet gambling: an overview of psychosocial impacts , 2006 .

[5]  N. Petry,et al.  Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: a focus on Internet gambling. , 2002, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[6]  T. Abel,et al.  Conceptualizing contemporary health lifestyles : Moving beyond Weber , 1997 .

[7]  L. Potvin,et al.  A theoretical proposal for the relationship between context and disease , 2001 .

[8]  Matt Stevenson,et al.  Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test , 2010 .

[9]  M. Griffiths.  A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework , 2005 .

[10]  S. Gregory,et al.  Profile of Internet Gamblers: Betting on the Future , 2005 .

[11]  M. Griffiths,et al.  The Social Impact of Internet Gambling , 2002 .

[12]  Robert T. Wood,et al.  Internet Gambling: Prevalence, Patterns, Problems, and Policy Options , 2009 .

[13]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Internet Gambling: Issues, Concerns, and Recommendations , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[15]  J. Rose.  Washington State Debates Level Playing Field, Again , 2005 .

[16]  Robert T. Wood,et al.  Problem gambling on the internet: implications for internet gambling policy in North America , 2007, New Media Soc..