Off-Line Metrology on SEM Images Using Gray Scale Morphology

Abstract.Discrimination and metrology results of microlithographic patterns from top-down SEM images are explored by means of morphological image analysis. The method relies on the use of various morphological filters on a top down SEM image. The resulted images are segmented in order to derive a quality factor which discriminates the candidate images as under- or fully-developed. Furthermore, the fully developed images are processed in order to extract useful measurements. The proposed image analysis methodology achieves for first time, to the authors’ knowledge, successful off-line discrimination between under-developed and fully-developed cases. For the latter case, the measuring method relies upon the evaluation of the connected regions in the SEM image after segmentation. This is expressed by the Useful Threshold Range (UTR), which corresponds to that specific value of connected regions obtained for the wider range of the threshold. The method is experimentally demonstrated by employing 72 test images from high resolution patterns. The evaluated critical pattern parameters are found in good agreement to those derived from on-line procedures.

[1]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Statistical models for estimating the measurement of pitch in metrology instruments , 1997 .

[2]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Image sharpness measurement in scanning electron microscopy—part I , 2006 .

[3]  M. Kanoh,et al.  A precise and automatic very large scale integrated circuit pattern linewidth measurement method using a scanning electron microscope , 1986 .

[4]  Ira J. Rosenberg Evaluating the resolution of a CD-SEM , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Angeliki Tserepi,et al.  Quantification of line-edge roughness of photoresists. I. A comparison between off-line and on-line analysis of top-down scanning electron microscopy images , 2003 .

[6]  A. Vladár,et al.  Image sharpness measurement in the scanning electron-microscope--part III. , 2006, Scanning.

[7]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[8]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Nonlinear Digital Filters - Principles and Applications , 1990, The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science.

[9]  Yuji Takagi,et al.  Characterizing cross-sectional profile variations by using multiple parameters extracted from top-down SEM images , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  K. Ronse,et al.  Metrology method for the correlation of line edge roughness for different resists before and after etch , 2001 .

[11]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  DIGITAL IMAGING FOR SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY , 2006 .

[12]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[13]  Will Conley,et al.  Top-down versus cross-sectional SEM metrology and its impact on lithography simulation calibration , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.