Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact

The field of information systems is premised on the centrality of information technology in everyday socio-economic life. Yet, drawing on a review of the full set of articles published inInformation Systems Research ( ISR) over the past ten years, we argue that the field has not deeply engaged its core subject matter--the information technology (IT) artifact. Instead, we find that IS researchers tend to give central theoretical significance to the context (within which some usually unspecified technology is seen to operate), the discrete processing capabilities of the artifact (as separable from its context or use), or the dependent variable (that which is posited to be affected or changed as technology is developed, implemented, and used). The IT artifact itself tends to disappear from view, be taken for granted, or is presumed to be unproblematic once it is built and installed. After discussing the implications of our findings, we propose a research direction for the IS field that begins to take technology as seriously as its effects, context, and capabilities. In particular, we propose that IS researchers begin to theorize specifically about IT artifacts, and then incorporate these theories explicitly into their studies. We believe that such a research direction is critical if IS research is to make a significant contribution to the understanding of a world increasingly suffused with ubiquitous, interdependent, and emergent information technologies.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  I. Illich Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .

[3]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[4]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[5]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[6]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[8]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[9]  Rob Kling,et al.  Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations , 1987 .

[10]  W. F. Christopher,et al.  Management for the 1980s , 1980 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[13]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[15]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Supporting Articulation Work , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[16]  J. Cash,et al.  Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager , 1988 .

[17]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[18]  Randall Davis,et al.  Heuristics for Reconciling Independent Knowledge Bases , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  P. Agre Computation and human experience , 1997 .

[20]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[21]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology , 1995 .

[22]  P. Gummett The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1988 .

[23]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[26]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[27]  Rob Kling,et al.  Computerization Movements: The Rise of the Internet and Distant Forms of Work , 2001 .

[28]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Timewatch: social analysis of time , 1995 .

[29]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[30]  Peter S. Fosl The Truth Is Not Out There , 1999 .

[31]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .