The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

The simultaneous-sequential method was used to test the processing capacity of statistical summary representations both within and between feature dimensions. Sixteen gratings varied with respect to their size and orientation. In Experiment 1, the gratings were equally divided into four separate smaller sets, one of which with a mean size that was larger or smaller than the other three sets, and one of which with a mean orientation that was tilted more leftward or rightward. The task was to report the mean size and orientation of the oddball sets. This therefore required four summary representations for size and another four for orientation. The sets were presented at the same time in the simultaneous condition or across two temporal frames in the sequential condition. Experiment 1 showed evidence of a sequential advantage, suggesting that the system may be limited with respect to establishing multiple within-feature summaries. Experiment 2 eliminates the possibility that some aspect of the task, other than averaging, was contributing to this observed limitation. In Experiment 3, the same 16 gratings appeared as one large superset, and therefore the task only required one summary representation for size and another one for orientation. Equal simultaneous-sequential performance indicated that between-feature summaries are capacity free. These findings challenge the view that within-feature summaries drive a global sense of visual continuity across areas of the peripheral visual field, and suggest a shift in focus to seeking an understanding of how between-feature summaries in one area of the environment control behavior.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  John Palmer,et al.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Alvarez Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[7]  H. Pashler,et al.  Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[9]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[10]  Cathleen M Moore,et al.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Jennifer E. Corbett,et al.  The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts: perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[12]  C. Moore,et al.  Orientation summary statistics are limited in processing capacity , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas H Carr,et al.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  A. Treisman,et al.  Dividing attention across feature dimensions in statistical processing of perceptual groups , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision , 2000 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  Chris Oriet,et al.  Rapid averaging? Not so fast! , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  From Textures to Crowds : Multiple Levels of Summary Statistical Perception , 2017 .

[19]  Daniel J Simons,et al.  Ensemble representations: effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[21]  Alva Noë,et al.  Is the visual world a grand illusion , 2002 .

[22]  Judith E. Fan,et al.  Feedback-driven tuning of statistical summary representations , 2013, Visual cognition.

[23]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  The association of color memory and the enumeration of multiple spatially overlapping sets. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[24]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  Seeing the mean: ensemble coding for sets of faces. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Individual differences in ensemble perception reveal multiple, independent levels of ensemble representation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[27]  Scott N. J. Watamaniuk,et al.  Direction Perception in Complex Dynamic Displays: the Integration of Dir~~tion Information , 1988 .

[28]  C. Moore,et al.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[33]  B. Bauer Does Stevens’s Power Law for Brightness Extend to Perceptual Brightness Averaging? , 2009 .

[34]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Statistical templates for visual search. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[35]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  High-level Pattern Coding Revealed by Brief Shape Aftereffects , 2005 .

[36]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[37]  David Whitney,et al.  Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene and broadening the limits of visual processing. , 2012 .

[38]  Sang Chul Chong,et al.  Mean Size as a Unit of Visual Working Memory , 2014, Perception.

[39]  A. Treisman,et al.  Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups , 2005, Vision Research.

[40]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Hee Yeon Im,et al.  Computation of mean size is based on perceived size , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[42]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic statistical processing of visual properties in simultanagnosia , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Ruth Rosenholtz,et al.  What your visual system sees where you are not looking , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[44]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[45]  D. Whitney Vision: Seeing through the Gaps in the Crowd , 2009, Current Biology.

[46]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[47]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[48]  S. Dakin Information limit on the spatial integration of local orientation signals. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[49]  David Melcher,et al.  Characterizing ensemble statistics: mean size is represented across multiple frames of reference , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[50]  R. Watt,et al.  The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture , 1997, Vision Research.

[51]  M. Heath,et al.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  L. Beach,et al.  Man as an Intuitive Statistician , 2022 .

[53]  Sung Jun Joo,et al.  Statistical processing: Not so implausible after all , 2008, Perception & Psychophysics.

[54]  J. Mauchly Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution , 1940 .

[55]  D. Simons,et al.  Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  When more is less: extraction of summary statistics benefits from larger sets. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[57]  Timothy D. Sweeny,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Perceiving Group Behavior : Sensitive Ensemble Coding Mechanisms for Biological Motion of Human Crowds , 2012 .

[58]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  P. Pollard,et al.  Intuitive judgments of proportions, means, and variances: A review , 1975 .

[60]  Jason B Mattingley,et al.  Is the whole really more than the sum of its parts? Estimates of average size and orientation are susceptible to object substitution masking. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  Correspondences Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces , 2007 .

[62]  P. Cavanagh Seeing the forest but not the trees , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  Chris Oriet,et al.  Size and emotion averaging: costs of dividing attention after all. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[64]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  Chris Oriet,et al.  Size averaging of irrelevant stimuli cannot be prevented , 2013, Vision Research.

[66]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.