Mechanical sensitivity and the dynamics of evolutionary rate shifts in biomechanical systems

The influence of biophysical relationships on rates of morphological evolution is a cornerstone of evolutionary theory. Mechanical sensitivity—the correlation strength between mechanical output and the system's underlying morphological components—is thought to impact the evolutionary dynamics of form–function relationships, yet has rarely been examined. Here, we compare the evolutionary rates of the mechanical components of the four-bar linkage system in the raptorial appendage of mantis shrimp (Order Stomatopoda). This system's mechanical output (kinematic transmission (KT)) is highly sensitive to variation in its output link, and less sensitive to its input and coupler links. We found that differential mechanical sensitivity is associated with variation in evolutionary rate: KT and the output link exhibit faster rates of evolution than the input and coupler links to which KT is less sensitive. Furthermore, for KT and, to a lesser extent, the output link, rates of evolution were faster in ‘spearing’ stomatopods than ‘smashers’, indicating that mechanical sensitivity may influence trait-dependent diversification. Our results suggest that mechanical sensitivity can impact morphological evolution and guide the process of phenotypic diversification. The connection between mechanical sensitivity and evolutionary rates provides a window into the interaction between physical rules and the evolutionary dynamics of morphological diversification.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  A general model of functional constraints on phenotypic evolution. , 2007, The American naturalist.

[2]  M. M. Blanco,et al.  MUSCLE TRADE‐OFFS IN A POWER‐AMPLIFIED PREY CAPTURE SYSTEM , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  C. D. Hulsey,et al.  Many-to-One Mapping of Form to Function: A General Principle in Organismal Design?1 , 2005, Integrative and comparative biology.

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[5]  D. Adams Comparing evolutionary rates for different phenotypic traits on a phylogeny using likelihood. , 2013, Systematic biology.

[6]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[7]  Adolf Seilacher,et al.  ARBEITSKONZEPT ZUR KONSTRUKTIONS‐MORPHOLOGIE , 1970 .

[8]  C. D. Hulsey,et al.  Projecting mechanics into morphospace: disparity in the feeding system of labrid fishes , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  M. Sanderson Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  Marcel Salathé,et al.  The effect of multifunctionality on the rate of evolution in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  R. Holzman,et al.  Biomechanical trade-offs bias rates of evolution in the feeding apparatus of fishes , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  D. Wake,et al.  The Quarterly Review of Biology INTEGRATING HISTORICAL AND MECHANISTIC BIOLOGY ENHANCES THE STUDY OF ADAPTATION , 2002 .

[13]  P. Wainwright Functional Versus Morphological Diversity in Macroevolution , 2007 .

[14]  S. Gould The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[15]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data , 2010 .

[16]  Roger Mundry,et al.  Stepwise Model Fitting and Statistical Inference: Turning Noise into Signal Pollution , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[17]  S. J. Arnold Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[18]  P. Wainwright,et al.  Coral reefs promote the evolution of morphological diversity and ecological novelty in labrid fishes. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[19]  R. Caldwell,et al.  Biomechanics: Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp , 2004, Nature.

[20]  D. Ackerly Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[23]  S N Patek,et al.  Linkage mechanics and power amplification of the mantis shrimp's strike , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  S N Patek,et al.  Mechanical sensitivity reveals evolutionary dynamics of mechanical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  D. Collar,et al.  DISCORDANCE BETWEEN MORPHOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL DIVERSITY IN THE FEEDING MECHANISM OF CENTRARCHID FISHES , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Michael E Alfaro,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX BIOMECHANICAL SYSTEMS: AN EXAMPLE USING THE FOUR‐BAR MECHANISM , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  M. McHenry,et al.  Gearing for speed slows the predatory strike of a mantis shrimp , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  B. O’Meara,et al.  MODELING STABILIZING SELECTION: EXPANDING THE ORNSTEIN–UHLENBECK MODEL OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  A. Herrel,et al.  THE QUICK AND THE FAST: THE EVOLUTION OF ACCELERATION CAPACITY IN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  Michael E Alfaro,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Many‐to‐One Mapping of Jaw Morphology to Mechanics in Labrid Fishes , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[32]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[33]  T. Cronin,et al.  Evolution of anatomical and physiological specialization in the compound eyes of stomatopod crustaceans , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[34]  T. F. Hansen STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  P. Wainwright,et al.  ELEVATED RATES OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIVERSIFICATION IN REEF‐DWELLING HAEMULID FISHES , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  S. Otto,et al.  Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling, why is animal size so important? , 1984 .

[39]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Form and function: structural analysis in evolutionary morphology , 1981, Paleobiology.

[40]  G. C. Anker Morphology and kinetics of the head of the stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus , 2010 .

[41]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .

[42]  M. Taper,et al.  Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[43]  S. Patek,et al.  MODULARITY AND SCALING IN FAST MOVEMENTS: POWER AMPLIFICATION IN MANTIS SHRIMP , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[45]  S N Patek,et al.  Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels : On Genes and Form , 2005 .

[47]  Edward Stuart Russell,et al.  Form and Function , 2009 .

[48]  M. Westneat,et al.  Transmission of force and velocity in the feeding mechanisms of labrid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes) , 1994, Zoomorphology.

[49]  Sheila N. Patek,et al.  The Most Powerful Movements in Biology , 2015 .

[50]  Stephan Mehler,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics , 2016 .

[51]  M. Westneat,et al.  Feeding mechanics of teleost fishes (Labridae; Perciformes): A test of four‐bar linkage models , 1990, Journal of morphology.

[52]  Richard Kennaway,et al.  On genes and form , 2017, Development.

[53]  M. McPeek,et al.  Survival selection on escape performance and its underlying phenotypic traits: a case of many‐to‐one mapping , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[54]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  Michael V. Rosario,et al.  Comparative spring mechanics in mantis shrimp , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[56]  S. Patek,et al.  LEVERS AND LINKAGES: MECHANICAL TRADE‐OFFS IN A POWER‐AMPLIFIED SYSTEM , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  J. Losos,et al.  Habitat use affects morphological diversification in dragon lizards , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[58]  D. Harville Matrix Algebra From a Statistician's Perspective , 1998 .

[59]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Molecular Evolution in Large Genetic Networks: Does Connectivity Equal Constraint? , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[60]  A. King,et al.  Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[61]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[62]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity , 2008 .

[63]  S N Patek,et al.  Elastic energy storage in the mantis shrimp's fast predatory strike , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.