A comparison of 4 primary age-structured stock assessment models used in the United States

— The National Marine Fisheries Service conducts fishery stock assessments to provide the best scientific information available for the U.S.

[1]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Essential features of the next-generation integrated fisheries stock assessment package: A perspective , 2020 .

[2]  E. Cortés,et al.  Stock status and reference points for sharks using data-limited methods and life history , 2018, Fish and Fisheries.

[3]  TM NMFS-F/SPO-183: Implementing a Next Generation Stock Assessment Enterprise. An Update to the NOAA Fisheries Stock Assessment Improvement Plan , 2018, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO.

[4]  R. Licandeo,et al.  Interactions between ageing error and selectivity in statistical catch-at-age models: simulations and implications for assessment of the Chilean Patagonian toothfish fishery , 2016 .

[5]  Ian J. Stewart,et al.  Reconciling stock assessment paradigms to better inform fisheries management , 2015 .

[6]  Joseph M. O’Malley,et al.  Model selection and multi-model inference for Bayesian surplus production models: A case study for Pacific blue and striped marlin , 2015 .

[7]  M. Dickey‐Collas,et al.  Stock assessment methods for sustainable fisheries , 2014 .

[8]  André E. Punt,et al.  A review of integrated analysis in fisheries stock assessment , 2013 .

[9]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Stock synthesis: A biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management , 2013 .

[10]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[11]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Adjusting for bias due to variability of estimated recruitments in fishery assessment models , 2011 .

[12]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  A Simulation-Based Method to Determine Model Misspecification: Examples using Natural Mortality and Population Dynamics Models , 2011 .

[13]  André E. Punt,et al.  Performance of a fisheries catch-at-age model (Stock Synthesis) in data-limited situations , 2011 .

[14]  J. Brodziak,et al.  Model averaging and probable status of North Pacific striped marlin, Tetrapturus audax. , 2010 .

[15]  Christopher M. Legault,et al.  Model averaging to estimate rebuilding targets for overfished stocks , 2005 .

[16]  David B. Sampson,et al.  Bias and Precision of Estimates from an Age-Structured Stock Assessment Program in Relation to Stock and Data Characteristics , 2004 .

[17]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the dynamics of exploited fish populations , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[18]  C. Walters A Partial Bias Correction Factor for Stock–Recruitment Parameter Estimation in the Presence of Autocorrelated Environmental Effects , 1990 .

[19]  R. Hilborn Simplified calculation of optimum spawning stock size from Ricker's stock recruitment curve , 1985 .

[20]  Elizabeth A. Fulton,et al.  Applying a New Ensemble Approach to Estimating Stock Status of Marine Fisheries around the World , 2018 .

[21]  Wayne A. Palsson,et al.  Assessment of the pollock stock in the Aleutian Islands , 2016 .

[22]  Kyle W. Shertzer,et al.  Technical documentation of the Beaufort Assessment Model (BAM) , 2015 .

[23]  Kevin R. Piner,et al.  Contemporary fisheries stock assessment: many issues still remain , 2015 .

[24]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Simulation testing the robustness of stock assessment models to error: some results from the ICES strategic initiative on stock assessment methods , 2015 .

[25]  André E. Punt,et al.  Time-varying natural mortality in fisheries stock assessment models: identifying a default approach , 2015 .

[26]  André E. Punt,et al.  The importance of length and age composition data in statistical age-structured models for marine species , 2015 .

[27]  R. Methot,et al.  Implementing a science-based system for preventing overfishing and guiding sustainable fisheries in the United States , 2014 .

[28]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[29]  Aaron J. Worstell Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 Cfr Part 600 Magnuson-stevens Act Provisions; National Standard Guidelines , 2010 .

[30]  J. J. Hunt,et al.  Workshop on risk evaluation and biological reference points for fisheries management , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[31]  P. Mace,et al.  A Review of Biological Reference Points in the Context of the Precautionary Approach , 1999 .

[32]  David B. Sampson,et al.  A Monte Carlo Evaluation of the Stock Synthesis Assessment Program , 1998 .

[33]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment , 1992, Springer US.