Directional control of planar human arm movement.

We examined the patterns of joint kinematics and torques in two kinds of sagittal plane reaching movements. One consisted of movements from a fixed initial position with the arm partially outstretched, to different targets, equidistant from the initial position and located according to the hours of a clock. The other series added movements from different initial positions and directions and >40-80 cm distances. Dynamic muscle torque was calculated by inverse dynamic equations with the gravitational components removed. In making movements in almost every direction, the dynamic components of the muscle torques at both the elbow and shoulder were related almost linearly to each other. Both were similarly shaped, biphasic, almost synchronous and symmetrical pulses. These findings are consistent with our previously reported observations, which we termed a linear synergy. The relative scaling of the two joint torques changes continuously and regularly with movement direction. This was confirmed by calculating a vector defined by the dynamic components of the shoulder and elbow torques. The vector rotates smoothly about an ellipse in intrinsic, joint torque space as the direction of hand motion rotates about a circle in extrinsic Cartesian space. This confirms a second implication of linear synergy that the scaling constant between the linearly related joint torques is directionally dependent. Multiple linear regression showed that the torque at each joint scales as a simple linear function of the angular displacement at both joints, in spite of the complex nonlinear dynamics of multijoint movement. The coefficients of this function are independent of the initial arm position and movement distance and are the same for all subjects. This is an unanticipated finding. We discuss these observations in terms of the hypothesis that voluntary, multiple degrees of freedom, rapid reaching movements may use rule-based, feed-forward control of dynamic joint torque. Rule-based control of joint torque with separate dynamic and static controllers is an alternative to models such as those based on the equilibrium point hypotheses that rely on a positionally based controller to produce both dynamic and static torque components. It is also an alternative to feed-forward models that directly solve the problems of inverse dynamics. Our experimental findings are not necessarily incompatible with any of the alternative models, but they describe new, additional findings for which we need to account. The rules are chosen by the nervous system according to features of the kinematic task to couple muscle contraction at the shoulder and elbow in a linear synergy. Speed and load control preserves the relative magnitudes of the dynamic torques while directional control is accomplished by modulating them in a differential manner. This control system operates in parallel with a positional control system that solves the problems of postural stability.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[3]  G Hart Perceptual distortion. , 1980, The Canadian nurse.

[4]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation? , 1982, Brain Research.

[7]  C. Chandler,et al.  Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Path constraints on point-to-point arm movements in three-dimensional space , 1986, Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Z. Hasan,et al.  Initiation rules for planar, two-joint arm movements: agonist selection for movements throughout the work space. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  The Dynamic Control of Single Joint Movements , 1991 .

[14]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  Virtual trajectories of single-joint movements performed under two basic strategies , 1992, Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  A Computational Model of the Simplest Motor Program. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Scaling of joint torque during planar arm movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  D A Hong,et al.  Task dependent patterns of muscle activation at the shoulder and elbow for unconstrained arm movements. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[20]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for voluntary movement: extending single-joint rules. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  D A Hong,et al.  Coordinating two degrees of freedom during human arm movement: load and speed invariance of relative joint torques. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Coordinating movement at two joints: a principle of linear covariance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.