Solvers' participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors

Abstract Organizations are increasingly crowdsourcing their tasks to unknown individual workers, i.e., solvers. Solvers' participation is critical to the success of crowdsourcing activities. However, challenges exist in attracting solvers to participate in crowdsourcing. In this regard, prior research has mainly investigated the influences of benefit factors on solvers’ intention to participate in crowdsourcing. Thus, there is a lack of understanding of the cost factors that influence actual participation behavior, in conjunction with the benefits. Additionally, the role of trust in the cost-benefit analysis remains to be explored. Motivated thus, based on social exchange theory and context-related literature, we develop a model to explain the impacts of benefit and cost factors as well as trust on solver participation behavior in crowdsourcing. The model was tested using survey and archival data from 156 solvers on a large crowdsourcing platform. As hypothesized, monetary reward, skill enhancement, work autonomy, enjoyment, and trust were found to positively affect solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing, while cognitive effort negatively affects their participation. In addition, it was found that monetary reward positively affects trust (trust partially mediates its effect on participation behavior), while loss of knowledge power negatively affects trust. The theoretical contributions and practical implications of the study are discussed.

[1]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[2]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  Working for one penny: Understanding why people would like to participate in online tasks with low payment , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Dan J. Kim,et al.  A Study of the Multilevel and Dynamic Nature of Trust in E-Commerce from a Cross-Stage Perspective , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[6]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[7]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[8]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  K. Williams,et al.  The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. , 1980 .

[10]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing for Organizational Value Co-Creation , 2013, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Nitza Geri,et al.  Crowdsourcing as a business model , 2017 .

[15]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[16]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  'Orchestrating' sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  P. Sheeran,et al.  The Intention–Behavior Gap , 2016 .

[18]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing - A Study on Mechanical Turk , 2011, AMCIS.

[19]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing: Giving Voice to the Less Powerful Through Value Sensitive Design , 2016, MIS Q..

[20]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  Marc Levoy Technical perspectiveComputational photography on large collections of images , 2008 .

[22]  R. Putnam The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[25]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Competing to Share Expertise: The Taskcn Knowledge Sharing Community , 2021, ICWSM.

[26]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[27]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[28]  Hua Ye,et al.  Why do you return the favor in online knowledge communities? A study of the motivations of reciprocity , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Dahui Li,et al.  Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[30]  Daren C. Brabham Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application , 2008, First Monday.

[31]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jan Henrik Sieg,et al.  Managerial Challenges in Open Innovation: A Study of Innovation Intermediation in the Chemical Industry , 2010 .

[33]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  M. Haas The Double-Edged Swords of Autonomy and External Knowledge: Analyzing Team Effectiveness in a Multinational Organization , 2010 .

[36]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  David Gefen,et al.  Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Trust in Virtual Online Environments , 2017 .

[40]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the workplace , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[42]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating the antecedents of organizational task crowdsourcing , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Jan Kietzmann,et al.  Crowdsourcing: A revised definition and introduction to new research , 2017 .

[44]  Jia Lin Xie,et al.  Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? , 1995 .

[45]  Daren C. Brabham MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS , 2010 .

[46]  Joey F. George,et al.  IT Road Warriors: Balancing Work--Family Conflict, Job Autonomy, and Work Overload to Mitigate Turnover Intentions , 2007, MIS Q..

[47]  Samuel Greengard,et al.  Following the crowd , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[48]  Gaby Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: guidelines and impirical illustration , 2009 .

[49]  Ben C. F. Choi,et al.  Understanding knowledge contribution in online knowledge communities: A model of community support and forum leader support , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[50]  H. Barkema,et al.  Feelings of Pride and Respect as Drivers of Ongoing Member Activity on Crowdsourcing Platforms , 2015 .

[51]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[52]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[54]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  Perceptions of virtual reward systems in crowdsourcing games , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[56]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[57]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[58]  Paola Cillo,et al.  Fostering Market Knowledge Use in Innovation:: The Role of Internal Brokers , 2005 .

[59]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Comparing Potential and Actual Innovators: An Empirical Study of Mobile Data Services Innovation , 2015, MIS Q..

[60]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice , 1997 .

[61]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[62]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..

[64]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[65]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[66]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[67]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[68]  Oded Nov,et al.  Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective , 2010 .

[69]  Linda D. Molm Coercive power in social exchange , 1997 .