A Conceptual Framework for the Generation of Adaptive Training Plans in Sports Coaching

Planning training sessions is one of the coaches’ main responsibilities in Sports Coaching. Coaches watch their athletes during training, identify key aspects of their performance that can be improved and plan training sessions to address the problems that they have observed. Limited work has been proposed and applied to the generation of training plans using technology. There is great potential for improving the generation of personalized training plans by using Machine Learning techniques. Recently, many methods and techniques were proposed in theory and practice in order to help athletes in sports training generally. Integrating some of these methods and techniques would result in the generation of automated, adaptive and personalized training plans. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for training plan generation in an adaptive and personalized way for athletes. This framework integrates performance indicators such as training load measures, physiological constraints, and behavior-change features like goal setting and self-monitoring. It provides a training plan, being adopted by the athlete, and its goal adapts to the athlete’s behavior.

[1]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Personalizing Mobile Fitness Apps using Reinforcement Learning , 2018, IUI Workshops.

[2]  Jos J de Koning,et al.  Monitoring Training Loads: The Past, the Present, and the Future. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[3]  Iztok Fister,et al.  Generating the Training Plans Based on Existing Sports Activities Using Swarm Intelligence , 2017 .

[4]  Jeanette M. López-Walle,et al.  Impact of the internal training load over recovery-stress balance in endurance runners , 2017 .

[5]  Damian Farrow,et al.  Developing Sport Expertise : Researchers and Coaches Put Theory into Practice, second edition , 2013 .

[6]  G. Slater,et al.  Cold-Water Immersion for Athletic Recovery: One Size Does Not Fit All. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[7]  Shona L. Halson,et al.  Monitoring Training Load to Understand Fatigue in Athletes , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[8]  Anil Aswani,et al.  Behavioral analytics for myopic agents , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Yuichi Fujiki,et al.  iPhone as a physical activity measurement platform , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  A. Borrie,et al.  Towards the reflective sports coach: issues of context, education and application , 2005, Ergonomics.

[11]  C. Foster,et al.  Is There Risk in Exercise Testing of Athletes? , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[12]  Aaron J. Coutts,et al.  A comparison of methods for quantifying training load: relationships between modelled and actual training responses , 2013, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  Lauren A. Grieco,et al.  Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to ActiGraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[14]  C. Foster,et al.  A New Approach to Monitoring Exercise Training , 2001, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[15]  Anil Aswani,et al.  Behavioral modeling in weight loss interventions , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  J. Leskovec,et al.  Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality , 2017, Nature.

[17]  K. Volpp,et al.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. , 2015, JAMA.

[18]  Kreangsak Tamee,et al.  Planning a sports training program using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with emphasis on physiological constraints , 2017, BMC Research Notes.

[19]  Michael Ian Lambert,et al.  Measuring training load in sports. , 2010, International journal of sports physiology and performance.