Pitch strength and Stevens’s power law

Recent studies have suggested that the saliency or the strength of pitch of complex sounds can be accounted for on the basis of the temporal properties in the stimulus waveform as measured by the height of the first peak in the waveform autocorrelation function. We used a scaling procedure to measure the pitch strength from 15 listeners for four different pitches of complex sounds in which the height of the first peak in the autocorrelation function systematically varied. Pitch strength judgments were evaluated in terms of a modification of Stevens’s power law in which temporal information was used from both the waveform fine structure and the envelope. Best fits of this modified power law to the judged pitch strengths indicate that the exponent in Stevens’s power law is greater than 1. The results suggest that pitch strength is primarily determined by the waveform fine structure, but the stimulus envelope can also contribute to the pitch strength.

[1]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise , 1996 .

[2]  M. E. Bryan,et al.  Individual loudness functions , 1970 .

[3]  W. Yost Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W A Yost,et al.  A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Patterson,et al.  A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Hellman,et al.  Growth of loudness at 1000 and 3000 Hz. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. Marks,et al.  The form of the psychophysical function near threshold , 1968 .

[8]  A. Logue,et al.  Individual differences in magnitude estimation of loudness , 1976 .

[9]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T. Yin,et al.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. Palmer,et al.  Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.

[12]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  W A Yost,et al.  The role of the envelope in processing iterated rippled noise. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  N. P. Poolos,et al.  Magnetoencephalography as a Noninvasive Probe of Brain Activity: The State of the Art , 1995 .

[15]  R. Hellman,et al.  Stability of individual loudness functions obtained by magnitude estimation and production , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  H. Olson The Measurement of Loudness , 1972 .

[17]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[18]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Loudness is a Product of Density Times Volume , 1964 .

[19]  W. Yost Pitch of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Patterson,et al.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[22]  Gerhard Stoll,et al.  Scaling of pitch strength , 1979, Hearing Research.