Network Performance Monitoring and Utilization Measurement

Computer intensive applications require efficient monitoring of computer networks. This can be enabled by operational analysis. In addition to other parameters, utilization measurement of a local network was carried out for a period of 24 hours by an artificially generated continuous workload, and at varying workloads caused by normal and increased use of network applications. Regardless of the rather high network workload, the commutated network proved its resistance to collisions and errors. It also showed a tendency to a change of utilization depending on the load itself. Utilization diagrams show the true behavior pattern of particular network segments. Utilization changes show a certain regularity by means of which future changes of performance might be foreseen.

[1]  Magesh Parthasarathy Analysis of network management of remote network elements , 2006, International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (ICNICONSMCL'06).

[2]  Kumbesan Sandrasegaran,et al.  Network management challenges for next generation networks , 2005, The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 30th Anniversary (LCN'05)l.

[3]  Daryoush Habibi,et al.  Loss performance analysis for heterogeneous ON-OFF sources with application to connection admission control , 2002, TNET.

[4]  A. Hanemann,et al.  Complementary Visualization of perfSONAR Network Performance Measurements , 2006, International Conference on Internet Surveillance and Protection (ICISP’06).

[5]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  Network performance monitoring at small time scales , 2003, IMC '03.

[6]  Naoaki Yamanaka,et al.  A simple bandwidth management strategy based on measurements of instantaneous virtual path utilization in ATM networks , 1998, TNET.

[7]  Mark Crovella,et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement , 2003 .

[8]  Paul J. Fortier,et al.  Computer Systems Performance Evaluation and Prediction , 2003 .

[9]  Rajeev Rastogi,et al.  Efficiently monitoring bandwidth and latency in IP networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[10]  Manish Jain,et al.  End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput , 2003, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..