In vivo monitoring of tumor angiogenesis with MR imaging.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a widely employed diagnostic method for the evaluation of patients with tumors. This method is noted for its remarkable soft-tissue definition, absence of ionizing radiation, high spatial and temporal resolution, and ability to generate images in any plane of the entire body. Equipment costs and, thus, examination costs are relatively high, however. MR imaging has been proposed and tested, both experimentally and clinically, as a method to characterize tumors regarding their state of angiogenesis. Multiple approaches to the challenge of MR imaging assays of angiogenesis have been proposed, some of which are potentially additive; all are intended to provide information regarding tumor microvessels. The quantitative end points that are sought include tissue plasma/blood volume, transendothelial permeability to water or solutes, perfusion/flow, and relative concentration of angiogenesis-specific molecules. The available approaches can be divided into intrinsic (non-contrast material enhanced) and contrast material-enhanced methods. The latter methods can be further divided by the type of contrast medium employed: small molecular agents that distribute rapidly in the extracellular space (so-called nonspecific or extracellular-fluid-space [ECF] agents), large molecular agents designed for prolonged intravascular retention (socalled macromolecular contrast media [MMCM] or bloodpool agents), and targeted agents intended to accumulate at the sites of concentrated angiogenesis mediator. Today, ECF contrast agents are commercially available and being used in clinical evaluations of antiangiogenesis drug treatments. Macromolecular contrast media are currently in clinical trials, but they are not now approved for use in humans. Molecular-targeted contrast media are in preclinical development. This section summarizes some of the many reports dealing with MR imaging assays of angiogenesis. For clarity, the discussion is divided by the specific MR imaging approach used. The rationale for that approach, limited information regarding the technique itself, accumulated experience, and limitations are provided, as well.

[1]  D M Shames,et al.  Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  D M Shames,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  On the characteristics of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[5]  F. Howe,et al.  Tumour response to hypercapnia and hyperoxia monitored by FLOOD magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  A. Schauer,et al.  The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  M. Moseley,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor-bearing mice treated with human recombinant tumor necrosis factor alpha. , 1990, Cancer research.

[8]  M. Neeman,et al.  Perfusion of the rat ovary: Application of pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  M V Knopp,et al.  Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[11]  M. Neeman,et al.  The antiangiogenic agent linomide inhibits the growth rate of von Hippel-Lindau paraganglioma xenografts to mice. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[12]  M. Neeman,et al.  Dynamic remodeling of the vascular bed precedes tumor growth: MLS ovarian carcinoma spheroids implanted in nude mice. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[13]  M. Neeman,et al.  Inhibition of neovascularization and tumor growth, and facilitation of wound repair, by halofuginone, an inhibitor of collagen type I synthesis. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[14]  Optimizing imaging techniques to reduce errors in microvascular quantitation with macromolecular MR contrast agents. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[15]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  M Kunnen,et al.  Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging detects suppression of tumor vascular permeability after administration of antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor. , 1998, Cancer investigation.

[18]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[19]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging using spin echoes , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  E. Stejskal Use of Spin Echoes in a Pulsed Magnetic‐Field Gradient to Study Anisotropic, Restricted Diffusion and Flow , 1965 .

[21]  H Lyng,et al.  Vascular density in human melanoma xenografts: relationship to angiogenesis, perfusion and necrosis. , 1998, Cancer letters.

[22]  G Brix,et al.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1998, Cancer research.

[23]  M Takahashi,et al.  Gd-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of breast masses. , 1999, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[24]  P J Drew,et al.  Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic gd‐dtpa enhanced MRI , 1997 .

[25]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[26]  T W Redpath,et al.  Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI using two‐ and three‐dimensional variable flip angle fast low‐angle shot , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  D M Shames,et al.  Quantification of the extraction fraction for gadopentetate across breast cancer capillaries , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  J. Allison,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  G Brix,et al.  Angiogenesis of uterine cervical carcinoma: characterization by pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance parameters and histological microvessel density with correlation to lymphatic involvement. , 1997, Cancer research.

[30]  M. Neeman,et al.  Spatial and temporal modulation of perfusion in the rat ovary measured by arterial spin labeling MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  R K Jain,et al.  Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. , 1994, Scientific American.

[32]  D B Kopans,et al.  Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. , 1997, Radiology.

[33]  H. Degani,et al.  Response of MCF7 human breast cancer to tamoxifen: evaluation by the three-time-point, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging method. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[34]  A R Padhani,et al.  Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Role of HIF-1α in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumour angiogenesis , 1998, Nature.

[36]  L D Buadu,et al.  Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. , 1996, Radiology.

[37]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced MR mammography , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[38]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  D. Cheresh,et al.  The role of alphav integrins during angiogenesis: insights into potential mechanisms of action and clinical development. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[40]  C Baldock,et al.  Test liquids for quantitative MRI measurements of self‐diffusion coefficient in vivo , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  M. Ogan,et al.  Albumin labeled with Gd-DTPA: an intravascular contrast-enhancing agent for magnetic resonance blood pool imaging: preparation and characterization. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[42]  H. Augustin,et al.  Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies. , 2000, Cancer research.

[43]  David A. Cheresh,et al.  Detection of tumor angiogenesis in vivo by αvβ3-targeted magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[44]  W E Reddick,et al.  MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: Promise for the new millenium , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  I. Yamada,et al.  Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[46]  T. Roberts,et al.  Physiologic measurements by contrast‐enhanced MR imaging: Expectations and limitations , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[47]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Integrin α v β 3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels , 1994, Cell.

[49]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[51]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: a quantitative method for histologic grading. , 1972, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[52]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. , 1988, The American journal of pathology.

[53]  J R Griffiths,et al.  The response of human tumors to carbogen breathing, monitored by Gradient-Recalled Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[54]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[55]  Michal Neeman,et al.  In Vivo Prediction of Vascular Susceptibility to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Withdrawal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of C6 Rat Glioma in Nude Mice , 1999 .

[56]  King C.P. Li,et al.  Paramagnetic Polymerized Liposomes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1995 .

[57]  B R Rosen,et al.  NMR imaging of changes in vascular morphology due to tumor angiogenesis , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[59]  King Li,et al.  Paramagnetic polymerized liposomes as new recirculating MR contrast agents , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[60]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Mr perfusion studies with t1‐weighted echo planar imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  O Salonen,et al.  MRI enhancement and microvascular density in gliomas. Correlation with tumor cell proliferation. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[62]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[63]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[64]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Quantitative angiogenesis assays: Progress and problems , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[65]  R K Jain,et al.  Quantitation and physiological characterization of angiogenic vessels in mice: effect of basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor, and host microenvironment. , 1996, The American journal of pathology.

[66]  A. Jackson,et al.  Abnormalities of the contrast re‐circulation phase in cerebral tumors demonstrated using dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced imaging: A possible marker of vascular tortuosity , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[67]  M. Leach,et al.  A rapid interleaved method for measuring signal intensity curves in both blood and tissue during contrast agent administration , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  M. Knopp,et al.  Cervical carcinoma: standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1999 .

[69]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1986, Microvascular research.

[70]  K. Aldape,et al.  Comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and albumin‐(Gd‐DTPA)30 for microvessel characterization in an intracranial glioma model , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[71]  A R Padhani,et al.  MRIW: parametric analysis software for contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in cancer. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[72]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Quantitation of angiogenesis in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model using fractal analysis. , 1996, Microvascular research.

[73]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[74]  D M Shames,et al.  Measurement of capillary permeability to macromolecules by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: A quantitative noninvasive technique , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[75]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative gadopentetate‐enhanced MRI of breast tumors: Testing of different analytic methods , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[76]  W T Yuh,et al.  An exciting and challenging role for the advanced contrast MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[77]  Risto A. Kauppinen,et al.  Quantitative assessment of blood flow, blood volume and blood oxygenation effects in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[78]  K. Norrby,et al.  Microvascular density in terms of number and length of microvessel segments per unit tissue volume in mammalian angiogenesis. , 1998, Microvascular research.

[79]  M. Neeman,et al.  Analysis of subcutaneous angiogenesis by gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[80]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. , 1994, Science.