Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.

PURPOSE To quantitatively compare the potential of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the grading of gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Both diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging were performed in 69 patients with pathologically proven gliomas by using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true ADC, pseudo-ADC, and perfusion fraction were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and distributed diffusion coefficient were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis were calculated from diffusion kurtosis images. All values were compared between high-grade and low-grade gliomas by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluations. RESULTS ADC, true ADC, perfusion fraction, water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index, distributed diffusion coefficient, and mean diffusivity values were significantly lower in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 109, 56, 129, 6, 206, and 229, respectively; P < .05). Pseudo-ADC and mean kurtosis values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 98 and 8, respectively; P < .05). Both water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.993) and mean kurtosis (AUC = 0.991) had significantly greater AUC values than ADC (AUC = 0.866), mean diffusivity (AUC = 0.722), and fractional anisotropy (AUC = 0.500) in the differentiation of low-grade and high-grade gliomas (P < .05). CONCLUSION Water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and mean kurtosis values may provide additional information and improve the grading of gliomas compared with conventional diffusion parameters.

[1]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[2]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[3]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  S. Brockstedt,et al.  Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[5]  R. Sevick,et al.  How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study , 2002, Neurology.

[6]  C. Metreweli,et al.  Diffusion MR imaging in glioma: does it have any role in the pre-operation determination of grading of glioma? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[7]  J. Neil,et al.  Evidence that both fast and slow water ADC components arise from intracellular space , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Hyde,et al.  Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched‐exponential model , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  L. Ko,et al.  Morphological characterization of nitrosourea-induced glioma cell lines and clones , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[10]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study † , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Lin Zhao,et al.  Effects of physiologic challenge on the ADC of intracellular water in the Xenopus oocyte , 2004, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[12]  J. Helpern,et al.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J. Guyotat,et al.  Clinical relevance of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in assessing intra-axial brain tumors , 2006, Neuroradiology.

[14]  G Johnson,et al.  Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  J. Helpern,et al.  Three‐dimensional characterization of non‐gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  J. Hyde,et al.  Water diffusion heterogeneity index in the human brain is insensitive to the orientation of applied magnetic field gradients , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  A. Jackson,et al.  Do cerebral blood volume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma? , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Gliomas: histopathologic evaluation of changes in directionality and magnitude of water diffusion at diffusion-tensor MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[19]  Tommaso Scarabino,et al.  Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy , 2006, Neuroradiology.

[20]  D. Louis.  WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007 .

[21]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007, Acta Neuropathologica.

[22]  Denis Le Bihan,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. , 2008 .

[23]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Diffusion-Tensor Imaging for Glioma Grading at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Analysis of Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  Denis Le Bihan,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Intravoxel water diffusion heterogeneity imaging of human high‐grade gliomas , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  Xiaohong Joe Zhou,et al.  Studies of anomalous diffusion in the human brain using fractional order calculus , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences. , 2010, Radiology.

[28]  Andrea Gabrielli,et al.  Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging: a brief practical review. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  B. Pollo.  Neuropathological diagnosis of brain tumours , 2011, Neurological Sciences.

[30]  Seung Hong Choi,et al.  Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. , 2011, Radiology.

[31]  Junling Gao,et al.  Diffusion abnormalities in temporal lobes of children with temporal lobe epilepsy: a preliminary diffusional kurtosis imaging study and comparison with diffusion tensor imaging , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[32]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Quantitative measurement of brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[33]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading. , 2012, Radiology.

[34]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Primary brain tumours in adults , 2003, The Lancet.

[35]  B. Stieltjes,et al.  The role of perfusion effects in monitoring of chemoradiotherapy of rectal carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[36]  M. Sumi,et al.  Head and Neck Tumors: Assessment of Perfusion-Related Parameters and Diffusion Coefficients Based on the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[37]  D. Yeung,et al.  Non-Gaussian Analysis of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Head and Neck at 3T: A Pilot Study in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2014, PloS one.